Open joint injury: Difference between revisions

(Text replacement - " ==" to "==")
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Background==
==Background==
[[File:Gray299.png|thumb|Generic diagram of a joint.]]
*Also known as "traumatic arthrotomy"
*Also known as "traumatic arthrotomy"
*Soft tissue injury that penetrates the joint space and exposes the joint space to the environment.  
*Soft tissue injury that penetrates the joint space and exposes the joint space to the environment.  
Line 9: Line 10:
**Septic arthritis is a potentially very morbid sequela of untreated open joints.
**Septic arthritis is a potentially very morbid sequela of untreated open joints.


== Clinical Features==
==Clinical Features==
*Concern for joint space involvement with soft tissue injury:
*Concern for joint space involvement with soft tissue injury:
**Proximity of soft tissue injury to joint
**Proximity of soft tissue injury to joint
Line 19: Line 20:
**Obvious joint involvement of fracture with an open fracture on X-ray
**Obvious joint involvement of fracture with an open fracture on X-ray


== Differential Diagnosis==
==Differential Diagnosis==
{{Extremity trauma DDX}}
{{Extremity trauma DDX}}


== Diagnosis==
===Intra-articular gas===
*[[Open joint injury]]
*Surgical intra-articular intervention
*[[Septic arthritis]]
*Normal variation (i.e., intra-articular vacuum phenomena)
 
==Evaluation==
[[File:Radiopedia knee.png|thumb|Knee CT showing pneumoarthrosis consistent with open joint injury.]]
 
===Workup===
''All lacerations should have basic exploration; for those near a joint, depending on ''
*[[ATLS]]
*[[ATLS]]
*X-ray
**Trauma labs PRN
*CT – look for air in joint
*Consider X-ray
*Trauma labs PRN
*Consider CT
*Those in which joint penetration is unclear can have joint loaded with either saline or methylene blue to look for extravasation from wound.
 
**Debate on sensitivity and specificity – some say sensitivity is far too low.  
===Diagnosis===
**However, negative joint loading test was associated with 0% infection rate in one study with non-operative management.<ref>Konda, S. R., Howard, D., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. The saline load test of theknee redefined: a test to detect traumatic arthrotomies and rule out periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 491–497 (2013).</ref>
====CT Scan====
*First-line diagnostic test
*~100% specific and sensitive for a clinically significant open joint injuries<ref>Konda, S. R., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. Computed tomography scan to detect traumatic arthrotomies and identify periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention: an improvement over the saline load test. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 498–504 (2013).</ref>
 
====Saline Loading Test====
*Second-line diagnostic test
**For those in which joint penetration is unclear  
**Involves injection into the joint (see [[arthrocentesis]] for procedural landmarks and technique) of saline or methylene blue to look for extravasation from wound.
**Sensitivity increases with increased fluid injected, but so does pain.
**Negative joint loading test associated with 0% infection rate in one study with non-operative management.<ref>Konda, S. R., Howard, D., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. The saline load test of theknee redefined: a test to detect traumatic arthrotomies and rule out periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 491–497 (2013).</ref>
**For knees, 50 mL is standard (sensitivity 46%, increased with ROM).  
**For knees, 50 mL is standard (sensitivity 46%, increased with ROM).  
***>195 mL loading (very painful) needed for 95% sensitivity in small lacerations near the knee.<ref>Keese, G. R., Boody, A. R., Wongworawat, M. D. & Jobe, C. M. The accuracy of the saline load test in the diagnosis of traumatic knee arthrotomies. J. Orthop. Trauma 21, 442–443 (2007).</ref>
***>195 mL loading (very painful) needed for 95% sensitivity in small lacerations near the knee.<ref>Keese, G. R., Boody, A. R., Wongworawat, M. D. & Jobe, C. M. The accuracy of the saline load test in the diagnosis of traumatic knee arthrotomies. J. Orthop. Trauma 21, 442–443 (2007).</ref>
**For elbows, 20 mL w/ range of motion gave 86% sensitivity, 40 mL gave 95%.<ref>Feathers, T. et al. Effectiveness of the saline load test in diagnosis of traumatic elbow arthrotomies. J. Trauma 71, E110–113 (2011).</ref>
**For elbows, 20 mL with range of motion gave 86% sensitivity, 40 mL gave 95%.<ref>Feathers, T. et al. Effectiveness of the saline load test in diagnosis of traumatic elbow arthrotomies. J. Trauma 71, E110–113 (2011).</ref>
**For ankle, 10 mL is average needed, 23 mL and 30 mL for 90% and 95% sensitivity.<ref>Bariteau, J. T., Blankenhorn, B. D. & Digiovanni, C. W. Evaluation of saline load test for simulated traumatic arthrotomies of the ankle. Injury 44, 1498–1501 (2013).</ref>
**For ankle, 10 mL is average needed, 23 mL and 30 mL for 90% and 95% sensitivity.<ref>Bariteau, J. T., Blankenhorn, B. D. & Digiovanni, C. W. Evaluation of saline load test for simulated traumatic arthrotomies of the ankle. Injury 44, 1498–1501 (2013).</ref>
**Another recent study suggests air in joint on CT of periarticular joint fracture is 95% sensitive for open joint and could potentially be used instead of joint loading(level III)<ref>Konda, S. R., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. Computed tomography scan to detect traumatic arthrotomies and identify periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention: an improvement over the saline load test. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 498–504 (2013).</ref>


== Treatment==
==Management==
=== Pain control===
===Pain control===
[[Opioid]] of choice
*[[Opioid]] of choice (e.g. [[fentanyl]] 50 mcg IV)
=== Wound management===
 
===Wound management===
*Initial immobilization as needed
*Initial immobilization as needed
*Orthopedic "Golden 6 hours" – applies similarly to open fractures. Treat <6 hours with surgical debridement and washout
*Orthopedic "Golden 6 hours" – applies similarly to open fractures. Treat <6 hours with surgical debridement and washout
Line 47: Line 67:
Depends on concern for infection (similar to [[open fractures]])<ref>Gosselin, R. A., Roberts, I. & Gillespie, W. J. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD003764 (2004).</ref>
Depends on concern for infection (similar to [[open fractures]])<ref>Gosselin, R. A., Roberts, I. & Gillespie, W. J. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD003764 (2004).</ref>
*[[Staph]]/[[strep]] coverage – 1st generation [[cephalosporin]] ([[cefazolin]] 2g IV TID)
*[[Staph]]/[[strep]] coverage – 1st generation [[cephalosporin]] ([[cefazolin]] 2g IV TID)
*If more contaminated – add [[anaerobic]] coverage ([[gentamicin]] 300 mg IV)
*If more contaminated – add [[anaerobic]] coverage ([[gentamicin]] 300mg IV)
*Very contaminated/farm contamination – concern for [[clostridial]] infection ([[piperacillin/tazobactam]] 4.5 g q8 hrs)
*Very contaminated/farm contamination – concern for [[clostridial]] infection ([[piperacillin/tazobactam]] 4.5 g q8 hrs)
*Seawater contamination – concern for [[vibrio vulnificus]] ([[doxycycline]])
*Seawater contamination – concern for [[vibrio vulnificus]] ([[doxycycline]])


== Disposition==
==Disposition==
Admit to trauma or orthopedic surgery
*Admit to trauma or orthopedic surgery


==See Also==
==See Also==
Line 59: Line 79:


==External Links==
==External Links==
[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/114453-overview#a7 General overview of joint loading test with methylene blue]
*[http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/114453-overview#a7 General overview of joint loading test with methylene blue]


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 20:19, 19 March 2025

Background

Generic diagram of a joint.
  • Also known as "traumatic arthrotomy"
  • Soft tissue injury that penetrates the joint space and exposes the joint space to the environment.
  • Increases the risk of joint infection and is cause for emergent orthopedic evaluation and treatment for joint exploration and washout.
  • Rarely life threatening:
    • Evaluate other injuries that may cause immediate loss of life/limb first.
    • Evaluate nearby neurovascular structures.
  • Maintain high suspicion for periarticular penetrating injuries to involve the joint:
    • Septic arthritis is a potentially very morbid sequela of untreated open joints.

Clinical Features

  • Concern for joint space involvement with soft tissue injury:
    • Proximity of soft tissue injury to joint
    • Visible joint capsule surface
    • Periarticular fracture
  • In these situations joint involvement is obvious and orthopedic surgery/washout is necessary without further testing:
    • Foreign body in joint on X-ray
    • Intra-articular air on X-ray or CT
    • Obvious joint involvement of fracture with an open fracture on X-ray

Differential Diagnosis

Extremity trauma

Intra-articular gas

Evaluation

Knee CT showing pneumoarthrosis consistent with open joint injury.

Workup

All lacerations should have basic exploration; for those near a joint, depending on

  • ATLS
    • Trauma labs PRN
  • Consider X-ray
  • Consider CT

Diagnosis

CT Scan

  • First-line diagnostic test
  • ~100% specific and sensitive for a clinically significant open joint injuries[1]

Saline Loading Test

  • Second-line diagnostic test
    • For those in which joint penetration is unclear
    • Involves injection into the joint (see arthrocentesis for procedural landmarks and technique) of saline or methylene blue to look for extravasation from wound.
    • Sensitivity increases with increased fluid injected, but so does pain.
    • Negative joint loading test associated with 0% infection rate in one study with non-operative management.[2]
    • For knees, 50 mL is standard (sensitivity 46%, increased with ROM).
      • >195 mL loading (very painful) needed for 95% sensitivity in small lacerations near the knee.[3]
    • For elbows, 20 mL with range of motion gave 86% sensitivity, 40 mL gave 95%.[4]
    • For ankle, 10 mL is average needed, 23 mL and 30 mL for 90% and 95% sensitivity.[5]

Management

Pain control

Wound management

  • Initial immobilization as needed
  • Orthopedic "Golden 6 hours" – applies similarly to open fractures. Treat <6 hours with surgical debridement and washout
  • Can irrigate grossly contaminated wounds in ED
  • Tetanus prophylaxis

Prophylactic Antibiotics

Depends on concern for infection (similar to open fractures)[6]

Disposition

  • Admit to trauma or orthopedic surgery

See Also

External Links

References

  1. Konda, S. R., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. Computed tomography scan to detect traumatic arthrotomies and identify periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention: an improvement over the saline load test. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 498–504 (2013).
  2. Konda, S. R., Howard, D., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. The saline load test of theknee redefined: a test to detect traumatic arthrotomies and rule out periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 491–497 (2013).
  3. Keese, G. R., Boody, A. R., Wongworawat, M. D. & Jobe, C. M. The accuracy of the saline load test in the diagnosis of traumatic knee arthrotomies. J. Orthop. Trauma 21, 442–443 (2007).
  4. Feathers, T. et al. Effectiveness of the saline load test in diagnosis of traumatic elbow arthrotomies. J. Trauma 71, E110–113 (2011).
  5. Bariteau, J. T., Blankenhorn, B. D. & Digiovanni, C. W. Evaluation of saline load test for simulated traumatic arthrotomies of the ankle. Injury 44, 1498–1501 (2013).
  6. Gosselin, R. A., Roberts, I. & Gillespie, W. J. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD003764 (2004).