PERC rule

Revision as of 01:40, 21 March 2026 by Danbot (talk | contribs) (Expand: stepwise application algorithm, validation data, clinical integration with Wells)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Background

  • Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria — used to identify patients in whom pulmonary embolism can be excluded without D-dimer testing
  • Only apply if clinical gestalt for PE is low (i.e., you would be confident PE is excluded with a negative D-dimer)
  • If ALL 8 criteria are met in a low-risk patient, no further workup is needed (negative predictive value >99%)

Criteria

PERC Rule Calculator

Check all of the following that are true:

  • Age <50yr
  • Pulse ox >94% (room air)
  • HR <100
  • No prior PE or DVT
  • No recent surgery or trauma (within prior 4wk)
  • No hemoptysis
  • No estrogen use
  • No unilateral leg swelling

In patients with low suspicion for PE (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0.9% had PE (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)[1][2]

Application

  • Step 1: Assess clinical probability (gestalt or Wells criteria)
  • Step 2: If low probability (Wells ≤4), apply PERC
  • Step 3: If all PERC criteria met → stop workup; no D-dimer needed
  • Step 4: If any PERC criterion NOT met → obtain D-dimer
  • Do NOT apply PERC in moderate or high pre-test probability patients

Validation

  • Validated on 8,138 patients across 13 EDs
  • Missed PE rate when PERC-negative with low gestalt: <2% (below the testing threshold)
  • No PE-related deaths in PERC-negative group at 45-day follow-up

See Also

References

  1. Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.
  2. Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).