Renal infarction: Difference between revisions

Line 20: Line 20:


==Evaluation==
==Evaluation==
Laboratory
===Laboratory===
*CBC with differential, CMP, LDH, urinalysis, urine culture
*CBC with differential, CMP, LDH, urinalysis, urine culture
* [[EKG]]- to evaluate for arrhythmia   
* [[EKG]]- to evaluate for arrhythmia   


Imaging:<ref>
===Imaging<ref>Decoste R, Himmelman JG, Grantmyre J. Acute renal infarct without apparent cause: A case report and review of the literature. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015;9(3-4):E237-E239. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2466.</ref>===
Decoste R, Himmelman JG, Grantmyre J. Acute renal infarct without apparent cause: A case report and review of the literature. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015;9(3-4):E237-E239. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2466.</ref>
*CT with IV contrast (preferred study)
*CT with IV contrast (preferred study)
*[[Renal ultrasound]] - less senstive
*[[Renal ultrasound]] - less senstive

Revision as of 19:01, 17 December 2017

Background

  • Low ED incidence, approximately 1 per 90 to 100, 000 visits a year
  • Diagnosis frequently missed due to mimicking symptoms similar to other more frequent complaints such as pyelonephritis and nephrolithiasis
  • Caused by interruption of blood supply to kidney

Major causes

Clinical Features

Differential Diagnosis

Flank Pain

Evaluation

Laboratory

  • CBC with differential, CMP, LDH, urinalysis, urine culture
  • EKG- to evaluate for arrhythmia

Imaging[1]

  • CT with IV contrast (preferred study)
  • Renal ultrasound - less senstive
  • MRI with gadolinium (contraindicated with severe renal impairment due to risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis)
  • Radioisotope scan - not commonly used

Management

Disposition

See Also

References

  1. Decoste R, Himmelman JG, Grantmyre J. Acute renal infarct without apparent cause: A case report and review of the literature. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015;9(3-4):E237-E239. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2466.