Renal infarction: Difference between revisions

Line 1: Line 1:
==Background==
==Background==
*Low ED incidence, approximately 1 per 90 to 100, 000 visits a year
*Low ED incidence, approximately 1 per 90 to 100, 000 visits a year
*Diagnosis frequently missed due to mimicking symptoms similar to other more frequent complaints such as pyelonephritis and nephrolithiasis
*Diagnosis frequently missed due to mimicking symptoms similar to other more frequent complaints such as [[pyelonephritis]] and [[nephrolithiasis]]
*Caused by interruption of blood supply to kidney
*Caused by interruption of blood supply to kidney


Line 7: Line 7:
*Cardioembolic disease  
*Cardioembolic disease  
*Renal artery injury
*Renal artery injury
*Hypercoagulable state
*[[Hypercoagulable state]]
*Dissection
*[[Dissection]]
*Vasculitis
*Vasculitis



Revision as of 18:57, 17 December 2017

Background

  • Low ED incidence, approximately 1 per 90 to 100, 000 visits a year
  • Diagnosis frequently missed due to mimicking symptoms similar to other more frequent complaints such as pyelonephritis and nephrolithiasis
  • Caused by interruption of blood supply to kidney

Major causes

Clinical Features

Differential Diagnosis

Flank Pain

Evaluation

Laboratory

  • CBC with differential, CMP, LDH, urinalysis, urine culture
  • EKG- to evaluate for arrhythmia

Imaging:[1]

  • CT with IV contrast (preferred study)
  • Renal ultrasound - less senstive
  • MRI with gadolinium (contraindicated with severe renal impairment due to risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis)
  • Radioisotope scan - not commonly used

Management

Disposition

See Also

References

  1. Decoste R, Himmelman JG, Grantmyre J. Acute renal infarct without apparent cause: A case report and review of the literature. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2015;9(3-4):E237-E239. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2466.