PERC rule: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out (PERC) Criteria If all BREATHS are present AND low suspicion for PE, no D-dimer needed: B- No blood in sputum R- room air sat > 95% E- No estrogen...")
 
(Expand: stepwise application algorithm, validation data, clinical integration with Wells)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out (PERC) Criteria
==Background==
*Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria — used to identify patients in whom [[pulmonary embolism]] can be excluded ''without'' D-dimer testing
*'''Only apply if clinical gestalt for PE is low''' (i.e., you would be confident PE is excluded with a negative D-dimer)
*If ALL 8 criteria are met in a low-risk patient, no further workup is needed (negative predictive value >99%)


If all BREATHS are present AND low suspicion for PE, no D-dimer needed:
==Criteria==
{{PERC rule}}


B- No blood in sputum
==Application==
*'''Step 1:''' Assess clinical probability (gestalt or [[Wells criteria]])
*'''Step 2:''' If low probability (Wells ≤4), apply PERC
*'''Step 3:''' If all PERC criteria met → stop workup; no D-dimer needed
*'''Step 4:''' If any PERC criterion NOT met → obtain [[D-dimer]]
*'''Do NOT apply PERC''' in moderate or high pre-test probability patients


R- room air sat > 95%
==Validation==
*Validated on 8,138 patients across 13 EDs
*Missed PE rate when PERC-negative with low gestalt: <2% (below the testing threshold)
*No PE-related deaths in PERC-negative group at 45-day follow-up


E- No estrogen or hormone use
==See Also==
*[[Pulmonary embolism]]
*[[Wells criteria]]
*[[D-dimer]]
*[[EBQ:PERC Rule Validation]]


A- Age < 50
==References==
<references/>


T- No  prior DVT or PE
[[Category:Pulmonary]]
 
[[Category:Vascular]]
H- Heart rate < 100bpm
 
S- No surgery/trauma requiring hospitalization in past 4 weeks
 
 
Note: Inclusion Criteria
 
Use this criteria if confident in excluding PE with negative D-dimer
 
Patient with dyspnea and PE was not felt to be the most likely Dx:
 
    -very low risk group ~2% overall PE risk
 
 
Note: Exclusion
 
DO NOT use if negative D-dimer does not r/o PE
 
 
Validated on 7527 patients found 96% sensitive in detecting PE
 
0.9% had PE, 0 died when all BREATHS present
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Pulm]]

Latest revision as of 01:40, 21 March 2026

Background

  • Pulmonary Embolism Rule-out Criteria — used to identify patients in whom pulmonary embolism can be excluded without D-dimer testing
  • Only apply if clinical gestalt for PE is low (i.e., you would be confident PE is excluded with a negative D-dimer)
  • If ALL 8 criteria are met in a low-risk patient, no further workup is needed (negative predictive value >99%)

Criteria

PERC Rule Calculator

Check all of the following that are true:

  • Age <50yr
  • Pulse ox >94% (room air)
  • HR <100
  • No prior PE or DVT
  • No recent surgery or trauma (within prior 4wk)
  • No hemoptysis
  • No estrogen use
  • No unilateral leg swelling

In patients with low suspicion for PE (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0.9% had PE (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)[1][2]

Application

  • Step 1: Assess clinical probability (gestalt or Wells criteria)
  • Step 2: If low probability (Wells ≤4), apply PERC
  • Step 3: If all PERC criteria met → stop workup; no D-dimer needed
  • Step 4: If any PERC criterion NOT met → obtain D-dimer
  • Do NOT apply PERC in moderate or high pre-test probability patients

Validation

  • Validated on 8,138 patients across 13 EDs
  • Missed PE rate when PERC-negative with low gestalt: <2% (below the testing threshold)
  • No PE-related deaths in PERC-negative group at 45-day follow-up

See Also

References

  1. Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.
  2. Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).