EBQ:Canadian Head CT Rule

incomplete Journal Club Article
Stiell IG, et al. "The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head trauma". The Lancet. 2001. 357(9266):1391-96.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Can a decision rule be used to determine which patients require CT imaging after head trauma?

Conclusion

The Canadian CT head rule is a effective method for determining the need for a patient to receive a non contrast brain CT after head trauma.

Major Points

The trial found that the following criteria had 100% sensitivity for identifying patient at risk for neurologic intervention with minor head injury

  1. GCS score <15 at 2h post injury
  2. Suspected open or depressed skull fracture
  3. Any sign of basal skull fracture (hemotympanum, ‘racoon’ eyes, cerebrospinal fluid otorrhoea/rhinorrhoea, Battle’s sign)
  4. Vomiting ≥ 2episodes
  5. Age ≥ 65 years
  • Minor head injury is defined as witnessed loss of consciousness, definite amnesia, or witnessed disorientation in a patients with a GCS score of 13–15

The moderate risk group (for brain injury on CT) was identified with 95% sensitivity if any of the following were present:

  1. Amnesia before impact >30 min
  2. Dangerous mechanism (pedestrian struck by motor vehicle, occupant ejected from motor vehicle, fall from height >3 feet or five stairs)

Design

  • Prospective cohort study in 10 Canadian community and teaching institutions
  • N=3121

Population

Inclusion Criteria

  • Blunt Trauma to the head causing witnessed loss of consciousness, definite amnesia, or witnessed disorientation)
  • GCS ≥ 13 on ED arrival
  • Head injury within the last 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria

  • Less than 16 years old
  • Minimal head injury (no loss of consciousness, amnesia, or disorientation)
  • No clear history of trauma as the primary event (eg, primary seizure or syncope)
  • Obvious penetrating skull injury or obvious depressed fracture
  • Acute focal neurological deficit
  • Unstable vital signs associated with major trauma
  • Seizure before assessment in the ED
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Using oral anticoagulants
  • Returned for reassessment of the same head injury
  • Pregnant

Baseline Characteristics

  • Mean age: 38 years
  • Age range 16-99
  • Men: 69%
  • Mean time between injury and physician assessment: 3.1 hours
  • Arrival by ambulance: 73%
  • Transfer from outside hospital: 13%
  • Witnessed loss of consciousness: 46%
  • Amnesia: 87%
  • Initial GCS score:
    • 15: 80%
    • 14: 17%
    • 13: 4%
  • Mechanism of injury:
    • Fall: 31%
    • MVA: 26%
    • Assault: 11%
    • Sports: 10%
    • Bicycle: 7%


Interventions

  • Patients underwent standard CT of the head according to the judgment of the treating physician.
  • The reliability of the radiography interpretations was assessed by having abnormal CT scans, and 5% (randomly selected) of normal scans reviewed by a second radiologist who was unaware of the first interpretation.
  • Patients were classified as having no clinically important brain injury if af 14 days they had:
    • no complaints of memory or concentration problems
    • no seizures
    • NO focal motor findings
    • Score ≤ 10 on the Katzman Short Orientation-Memory-COncentration Test
    • Returned to normal daily activities

Outcomes

Criticisms

Funding

Funded by peer-reviewed grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada (MT-13699) and the Ontario Ministry of Health Emergency Health Services Committee (11896N)

CME