Toxic epidermal necrolysis

Background

Normal dermal anatomy.
  • Severe, life-threatening mucocutaneous reaction characterized by widespread epidermal necrosis and detachment
  • Represents a spectrum with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS):
    • SJS: <10% body surface area (BSA) detachment
    • SJS-TEN overlap: 10-30% BSA detachment
    • TEN: >30% BSA detachment
  • Medications are the cause in 80-95% of cases
    • Most common: sulfonamides, anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine), allopurinol, NSAIDs, penicillins
    • Typically occurs 1-3 weeks after drug initiation
  • Other triggers: Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection (especially in children), HIV, malignancy
  • Mortality: 25-35% for TEN, 1-5% for SJS
  • HLA-B*5801 (allopurinol) and HLA-B*1502 (carbamazepine) associated with increased risk

Clinical Features

Toxic epidermal necrolysis on legs
The back of a TENs patient on day 10, at the peak of the condition
  • Prodrome (1-3 days before skin findings):
  • Skin findings:
    • Tender erythematous or dusky macules → confluent areas of necrosis
    • Flaccid bullae with full-thickness epidermal detachment
    • Positive Nikolsky sign (lateral pressure causes epidermal separation)
    • Positive Asboe-Hansen sign (pressure on blister causes lateral extension)
    • Skin sloughs in sheets, leaving raw denuded dermis
  • Mucosal involvement (present in >90% of cases):
    • Oral (painful erosions, inability to eat/drink)
    • Ocular (conjunctivitis, corneal erosions — ophthalmology emergency)
    • Genitourinary (dysuria, urinary retention)
    • Respiratory (tracheobronchial sloughing may cause respiratory failure)
  • Systemic complications:

Differential Diagnosis

Erythematous rash

Evaluation

  • Clinical diagnosis based on:
    • History of drug exposure within preceding 1-4 weeks
    • Prodrome of fever and malaise
    • Positive Nikolsky sign
    • Mucosal erosions with skin detachment
  • Labs:
  • Skin biopsy: full-thickness epidermal necrosis (distinguishes from SSSS)
  • SCORTEN severity score (assess within first 24 hours):[1]
    • Age >40, malignancy, HR >120, initial BSA detachment >10%, BUN >28, glucose >252, bicarb <20
    • Score ≥3 = mortality >35%; Score ≥5 = mortality >90%

Management

Immediate

  • Discontinue ALL suspected causative medications immediately
    • Early drug withdrawal (within 24h of blister onset) improves survival
  • Manage as a burn patient — transfer to burn center when stable
  • Fluid resuscitation:
    • Less than typical burn (use 2/3 Parkland formula or ~2-3 mL/kg/%BSA/day)
    • Target UOP 0.5-1 mL/kg/hr
  • Wound care:
    • Minimize handling; leave intact bullae when possible
    • Non-adherent dressings (e.g., Aquacel, petrolatum gauze)
    • Do NOT debride attached skin
  • Temperature regulation: raise ambient temperature to 30-32°C

Supportive

  • Pain control: IV opioids, avoid NSAIDs if suspected trigger
  • Nutrition: early enteral nutrition via NG tube if unable to eat
  • DVT prophylaxis
  • Eye care: urgent ophthalmology consult, preservative-free lubricating drops, amniotic membrane grafting for severe involvement
  • Mouth care: antiseptic mouthwash, viscous lidocaine
  • Infection monitoring: avoid prophylactic antibiotics (increases resistance); culture if signs of sepsis
  • Foley catheter if GU involvement

Specific Therapies (Controversial)

  • Cyclosporine 3-5 mg/kg/day: best available evidence for mortality reduction
  • IVIG: conflicting data, some protocols use 1-2 g/kg over 3-4 days
  • Systemic corticosteroids: controversial; short pulse may be considered early
  • TNF-α inhibitors (etanercept): emerging evidence for benefit

Disposition

  • All patients require admission, preferably to a burn center ICU
  • Consults: dermatology, ophthalmology, burn surgery
  • Patients may require weeks-months of wound care and rehabilitation
  • Long-term complications: skin scarring, ocular sequelae (symblepharon, blindness), genital stenosis
  • Document causative drug allergy prominently in medical record

See Also

References

  • Schwartz RA, McDonough PH, Lee BW. Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Part I: Introduction, history, classification, clinical features, systemic manifestations, etiology, and immunopathogenesis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(2):173.e1-13. PMID 23866878
  • Schwartz RA, McDonough PH, Lee BW. Toxic epidermal necrolysis. Part II: Prognosis, sequelae, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(2):187.e1-16. PMID 23866879
  • Sekula P, et al. Comprehensive survival analysis of a cohort of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133(5):1197-1204. PMID 23389396
  • Gonzalez-Herrada C, et al. Cyclosporine use in epidermal necrolysis is associated with an important mortality reduction. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(2):607-615. PMID 27448444
  • Bastuji-Garin S, et al. SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115(2):149-153. PMID 10951229
  1. Bastuji-Garin S, et al. SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;115(2):149-153. PMID 10951229