Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator complication
Background
Nomenclature
- All ICDs are also pacemakers (i.e. have pacing functionality) but pacemakers are not ICDs (i.e. do not have shocking functionality)
Parts
- Pulse Generator
- Typically implanted in L upper chest wall
- Contains device hardware and battery
- Acts as a shocking electrode in defibrillation
- Leads
- Insulated and antimicrobial-coated
- Atrial lead
- Pacing and sensing functionality
- Typical bipolar (pacing and sensing are performed by two electrodes, located several millimeters apart at the tip of the lead)
- Right ventricular lead
- Pacing, sensing, and defibrillation functionality
- Has one or two coils to facilitate defibrillation
- Easily identified on Chest X-Ray and can hep differentiate an ICD from a pacemaker
- Typical bipolar (pacing and sensing are performed by two electrodes, located several millimeters apart at the tip of the lead)
- Left Ventricular Lead
- Pacing and sensing functionality
- Bipolar or unipolar (pacing and sensing are performed by one electrode at the tip of the LV lead and a second remote electrode, typically either one of the RV electrodes or the pulse generator)
Indications for ICD implantation
- Secondary Prevention[1]
- Previous episode of unstable VT or VF
- Not indicated if VT/VF occurs <48 hours after myocardial infarction
- Sustained VT in setting of cardiomyopathy or channelopathy
- Previous episode of unstable VT or VF
- Primary Prevention[2]
- Myocardial infarction >40 days ago with LVEF <30%
- Cardiomyopathy + NYHA Functional Class II or III, and LVEF <35%
- Controversy exists over applying the above criteria to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
- Patients with underlying disorders placing them at high risk for unstable VT or VF
- Congenital long QT syndrome
- High-risk HOCM
- Brugada syndrome
- ARVD
- Other channelopathies
- Biventricular ICD (i.e. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)
- Any of the above with intraventricular conduction delay of >120ms
Functions
- Can perform all functions of pacemakers
- Anti-tachycardia pacing
- In response to a ventricular rate within a pre-set range (typically ~150-220 bpm), the device will compare the ongoing QRS morphology to a saved image of a QRS complex that is known to be a sinus beat; if the ICD algorithm determines that the ongoing morphology is significantly different (i.e. is unlikely to be a sinus tachycardia), it will deliver a series of paced beats at a rate slightly faster than the ongoing rate in an attempt to break the re-entrant cycle
- A device will typically be programmed to attempt anti-tachycardia pacing several times; if unsuccessful, it will move on to defibrillation
- Defibrillation
- Delivery of a large electrical shock (up to 42 joules) from one electrode to the other in response to VT or VF
- Magnet Mode
- Placement of a magnet over the generator will deactivate anti-tachycardia pacing and defibrillation modes as long as the magnet is in place.
- Diagnostics
- Records rhythm strips of AF, VT, and VF episodes for later review
- If anti-tachycardia pacing or defibrillation has occurred, there will be a large alert on the device's interrogation home screen
- Keeps track of % of paced vs intrinsic beats
- Keeps a rate histogram, as well as % of time spent in AF
- Records rhythm strips of AF, VT, and VF episodes for later review
Methods to Identify Manufacturer
- Patient should carry a pocket card indicating manufacturer
- Manufacturer Hotline has patient database
- Medtronic Inc. (1-800-328-2518)
- St. Jude Medical Inc. (recently acquired by Abbott, Inc.) (1-800-722-3774)
- Boston Scientific Inc. (1-800-227-3422)
- Magnet mode
- Does not help differentiate ICDs (different than pacemakers)
Electromagnetic Interference
- Nonmedical
- Cell phones: do not interact with device
- Airport security: may trigger alarm, no alteration of activity
- Medical Sources
- MRI: mostly safe, consult cards on device specific recs
- Cardioversion: Use AP pads >8cm from device to minimize adverse effects
- Unipolar Cautery - can cause sensing and pacing malfunction as well as reprogramming
Complications
Defibrillator Shocks
- Approximately 1/3 - 1/2 of ICD patients receive a shock within one year of placement[3]
- Generally described by patients as a powerful "kick to the chest"
- Can be very distressing and a source of anxiety for patients
- Inappropriate Shocks
- Causes
- Misclassification by device of SVT or AF as VT or VF
- Electrical Noise
- Fractured Lead
- Can be diagnosed by interrogation of device after a reported shock
- Causes
- Phantom Shocks
- The perception of a shock without a delivered shock
- Generally described by patients as a mild electrical pain or pain around the defibrillator site
- More common in patients who have never had an actual shock
- Occurs in 9% of patients each year[4]
Pacemaker Malfunctions
Problems with pocket
- Infection
- Most commonly S. aureus or S. epidermidis
- 2% local wound infection; 1% sepsis/bacteremia
- Hematoma
- Typically occurs shortly after placement
Problems with leads
- Dislodgment
- Perforation (most commonly at RV apex)
- Infection can cause severe sepsis
- Tricuspid regurgitation
- Coiling (ie: Twiddler's Syndrome)
Failure to Capture
- Delivery of pacing stimulus without depolarization
- Functional - refractory myocardium, desensitized local tissue around the lead
- Medical - drugs, myocardial disease, electrolytes
- Technical - insufficient device output, lead dislodgment, fracture, insulation defect, ventricular wall perforation
- Battery of End of Life (EOL)
Failure to Pace
- Failure to deliver a stimulus to the heart
- Oversensing - most common cause: retrograde P’s, T’s, skeletal muscle myopotentials,
- Crosstalk - type of oversensing where the ventricular lead senses atrial pacing stimulus, and ventilator output inhibited
Failure to Sense
- Normal function: a sensed myocardial depolarization greater than the programmed threshold causes inhibition of pacing
- Failure to sense results in a paced beat on top of an intrinsic beat (as the device is "unaware" of the intrinsic beat")
- Voltages of patient's intrinsic QRS complex is too low to be detected
- New intrinsic arrhythmia (AF has a smaller depolarization than sinus beat), AMI, electrolyte abnormalities, lead separation, battery depletion
Runaway Pacing
- Physiologic electrical activity (T waves, muscle potentials)
- External electromagnetic interference
- Signals generated by interaction of different portions of the pacing system
- Potentially life-threatening as it can cause V-Fib or (paradoxically) bradycardia due to failure to capture
Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardia
- Also known as Endless Loop Tachycardia
- Formation of a re-entrant circuit causing inappropriate tachycardia
- Most commonly: paced ventricular beat -> retrograde AV node conduction -> intrinsic P wave -> device reacts to intrinsic P wave by looking for intrinsic QRS, but since AV node is now refractory it delivers a paced beat at the programmed P-R interval (typically ~200-250ms), starting the process anew
- Tachycardia does not exceed programmed upper limit rate on pacemaker
Evaluation
Work-Up
- BMP and Mg
- CXR
- ECG
- Troponin
- Interrogation
- Each company has on-call representatives who will come interrogate a device 24/7 (phone numbers above)
- Most cath labs will have machines capable of interrogating each brand
Expected ECG Patterns
- Absence of pacer artifact indicates intrinsic depolarization
- With newer pacemakers, pacer spikes may not appear on some or all paced beats, depending on EKG machine
- Pacing artifacts preceding depolarizations indicate successful pacing and capture
- Leads in RV apex produce LBBB pattern with appropriate discordance
- New RBBB pattern may indicate lead in LV
- Bi-ventricular devices can produce paced QRS complexes that are either narrow or wide and bizarre, depending on device programming
- Simultaneous depolarization of ventricles produces dominant R wave in V1
Plain Film Findings
- Obtain PA/Lateral Films to confirm pulse generator, manufacturer, lead placement/number/integrity
- R atrial lead J shaped(tip medially on AP) entering right atrial appendage
- RV leads point downward with tip between left spine and cardiac apex--lateral XR shows inferior and anterior
- Coronary sinus lead- courses posteriorly on lateral XR
- Extra leads may be appropriately abandoned and capped
- ICD component appears as thickened shock coil
Management
- Reported Shock
- If unable to prove a phantom shock, electrophysiology or cardiology consult is often needed
- Interrogation is mandatory, either by an experienced clinician or by device representative
- Some devices can be remotely interrogated; contact the respective company representative at the above phone numbers to discuss this possibility
- Repeated Shocks
- Before placement of a magnet or changing the device parameters, you must determine if the shocks are appropriate (i.e. the patient is in VT storm or having recurrent episodes of VF) or inappropriate
- If it is determined that the shocks are inappropriate, a magnet will deactivate the shocking function while placed over the device
- Electrophysiology consult
- Before placement of a magnet or changing the device parameters, you must determine if the shocks are appropriate (i.e. the patient is in VT storm or having recurrent episodes of VF) or inappropriate
- Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardia
- Break with adenosine - magnet will not fix PMT in a patient with a defibrillator
Disposition
- Consider discharge if:
- Proven Phantom Shock
- Resolved Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardia
- Single shock only AND Currently asymptomatic AND No concerning associated symptoms (e.g. chest pain, dyspnea, syncope)
- Ensure patient has Electrophysiology/Cardiology follow-up
- Consider Electrophysiology/Cardiology consult
- Admit all others
See Also
External Links
References
- ↑ Al-Khatib SM et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(14):e91. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
- ↑ Al-Khatib SM et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(14):e91. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
- ↑ Sears SF Jr., Shea JB, Conti JB. Cardiology patient page. How to respond to an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock. Circulation. 2005;111:e380–e382
- ↑ Berg SK et al. Phantom shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from a randomized rehabilitation trial (COPE-ICD). Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1463-7. Epub 2013 Apr 18.