Appendicitis

Revision as of 19:53, 21 March 2026 by Danbot (talk | contribs) (Major update: Alvarado/AIR scores, CODA trial antibiotics-first approach, atypical presentations (pregnancy/elderly/retrocecal), MRI in pregnancy, interval appendectomy, references with PMIDs)

Background

  • Most common surgical emergency worldwide
  • Lifetime risk: ~7-8% (peak incidence ages 10-30)
  • Pathophysiology: luminal obstruction (fecalith, lymphoid hyperplasia, rarely tumor) → bacterial overgrowth → wall inflammation → ischemia → perforation
  • Perforation risk increases with time: ~2% at 24 hours, increasing to ~50% by 72 hours
  • Atypical presentations common in: children, elderly, pregnant women, immunocompromised

Clinical Features

Classic Presentation

  • Periumbilical pain migrating to RLQ over 12-24 hours (migration is most specific historical feature)
  • Anorexia (nearly universal; absence should raise doubt)
  • Nausea, vomiting (usually after onset of pain)
  • Low-grade fever (high fever suggests perforation/abscess)

Physical Exam

  • McBurney point tenderness (1/3 distance from ASIS to umbilicus)
  • Rovsing sign: RLQ pain with LLQ palpation
  • Psoas sign: RLQ pain with right hip extension (retrocecal appendix)
  • Obturator sign: RLQ pain with internal rotation of flexed right hip (pelvic appendix)
  • Rebound tenderness and guarding (peritoneal irritation)
  • Dunphy sign: increased pain with coughing

Atypical Presentations

  • Retrocecal appendix (~30%): flank or back pain, positive psoas sign, less peritoneal irritation
  • Pelvic appendix: suprapubic pain, urinary symptoms, diarrhea
  • Pregnant women: RUQ pain (displaced appendix); less peritoneal signs; higher perforation rate[1]
  • Elderly: delayed presentation, less fever, higher perforation rate (~50%)
  • Children <5: nonspecific symptoms; perforation common by presentation

Differential Diagnosis

Template:RLQ pain DDX

Evaluation

Labs

  • WBC: elevated in ~80% (but normal WBC does NOT exclude appendicitis)
  • CRP: elevated; combined normal WBC + normal CRP has high NPV
  • Urinalysis: mild pyuria/hematuria may occur (inflammation adjacent to ureter) — does not exclude appendicitis
  • Pregnancy test in all reproductive-age women
  • Lipase if epigastric component

Clinical Decision Rules

  • Alvarado Score (MANTRELS): Migration, Anorexia, Nausea, Tenderness RLQ, Rebound, Elevation of temp, Leukocytosis, Shift to left
    • Score ≤3: low risk; 4-6: moderate; ≥7: high probability
  • AIR Score (Appendicitis Inflammatory Response): incorporates CRP
  • These scores help risk-stratify but do NOT replace clinical judgment

Imaging

CT Abdomen/Pelvis with IV Contrast (Test of Choice in Adults)

  • Sensitivity 94-98%, specificity 95%
  • Findings: enlarged appendix > 6 mm diameter, periappendiceal fat stranding, appendicolith, wall enhancement
  • Signs of perforation: abscess, extraluminal air, phlegmon
  • Oral contrast generally NOT needed

Ultrasound (First-line in Pediatrics and Pregnancy)

  • Sensitivity 86%, specificity 81% (operator dependent)
  • Findings: non-compressible appendix > 6 mm, target sign, periappendiceal fluid
  • If US equivocal in pediatrics: MRI preferred over CT to avoid radiation

MRI (Alternative in Pregnancy)

  • Sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%
  • Preferred over CT in pregnancy (no radiation)

Management

Uncomplicated Appendicitis

  • NPO, IV fluids, pain control (analgesics do NOT mask peritoneal signs)
  • Pre-operative antibiotics: cefoxitin 2g IV or ceftriaxone + metronidazole
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (standard of care)
  • Antibiotics-first approach: emerging evidence supports nonoperative management with antibiotics alone for selected uncomplicated appendicitis (CODA trial)[2]
    • ~30% failure/recurrence rate at 1 year
    • Shared decision-making with patient and surgeon

Complicated Appendicitis (Perforated/Abscess)

  • Broad-spectrum antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375-4.5g IV OR ceftriaxone + metronidazole
  • Small phlegmon/abscess (<3 cm): antibiotics + interval appendectomy in 6-8 weeks
  • Large abscess (>3 cm): CT-guided percutaneous drainage + antibiotics + interval appendectomy
  • Peritonitis/sepsis: emergent appendectomy

Disposition

  • Surgical consultation for all confirmed or highly suspected appendicitis
  • Admit for surgical management
  • If appendicitis suspected but imaging equivocal: observation with serial exams or repeat imaging in 6-12 hours
  • Discharge with close follow-up only if alternative diagnosis confirmed and appendicitis reliably excluded

See Also

References

  1. Mourad J, et al. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1027-1029. PMID 10819817
  2. CODA Collaborative. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(20):1907-1919. PMID 33017106
  • Di Saverio S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27. PMID 32295644
  • Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287. PMID 26460662
  • Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557-564. PMID 3963537