EBQ:Wells PE Rule Out: Difference between revisions

(major points)
(added templates)
Line 22: Line 22:


==Major Points==  
==Major Points==  
{| class="wikitable"
{{Wells Criteria}}
|-
 
! Characteristics !! Points
{{Wells Score}}
|-
| Symptoms of DVT (leg swelling and pain with palpation) || 3.0
|-
| HR >100 bpm || 1.5
|-
| Immobilization for >3 consecutive days || 1.5
|-
| Surgery in the previous 4 weeks || 1.5
|-
| Previous DVT or PE || 1.5
|-
| Hemoptysis || 1.0
|-
| Malignancy (receiving treatment, treatment stopped within 6 mon, palliative care) || 1.0
|-
| PE as likely as or more likely than an alternative diagnosis || 3.0
|}


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Pre-test Probability !! Total Points
|-
| Low || < 2.0
|-
| Moderate || 2.0-6.0
|-
| High || > 6.0
|-
|}
==Study Design==
==Study Design==
Prospective Cohort Study of 4 tertiary care hospitals in Canada
Prospective Cohort Study of 4 tertiary care hospitals in Canada

Revision as of 19:20, 21 September 2015

Under Review Journal Club Article
Wells PS et al. "Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and D-Dimer". Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001. 135(2):98-107.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Is there a simple clinical model along with d-dimer assay testing that can be used to manage patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism?

Conclusion

Patients can be safely managed for suspected pulmonary embolism on the basis of pretest probability and d-dimer

Major Points

Template:Wells Criteria

Wells Criteria

Clinical Features Points
Symptoms of DVT (leg swelling and pain with palpation) 3.0
PE as likely as or more likely than an alternative diagnosis 3.0
HR >100 bpm 1.5
Immobilization for >3 consecutive days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks 1.5
Previous DVT or PE 1.5
Hemoptysis 1.0
Malignancy (receiving treatment, treatment stopped within 6 mon, palliative care) 1.0
Two Tier Wells Score
  • Score 0-4 = PE Unlikely (12.1% incidence of PE)
    • Check D-dimer
      • If D-dimer positive then obtain CTPA or V/Q scan
      • If D-dimer negative, no further workup needed (0.5% incidence of PE at 3 month follow up)
  • Score >4 = PE Likely (37.1% incidence of PE)
    • Obtain CT Pulmonary Angiography or V/Q Scan
  • New evidence suggests lower Wells Score with D-dimer <1000 ng/mL is effective at ruling out PE without imaging

Study Design

Prospective Cohort Study of 4 tertiary care hospitals in Canada

  • Patients were evaluated by 1 of 43 EM physicians
  • Physician assigned points according to the Well's criteria points table above
  • Physicians were told to use clinical information, CXR, EKG, and whatever blood tests were considered necessary
  • Patients received diagnosis of PE if they had high-probability V-P scan, abnormal result on ultrasound or pulmonary angiography, VTE during follow-up
  • If the diagnosis of PE was excluded, patients were followed up for 3 months for the development of thromboembolic events

Population

Patient Demographics

Inclusion Criteria

  • Consecutive patients presenting to participating EDs
  • Suspicion of PE
  • Symptoms for <30 days
  • Acute onset of new or worsening shortness of breath or chest pain

Exclusion Criteria

  • Suspected DVT of the upper extremity as a likely source of PE
  • No symptoms of PE within 3 days of presentation
  • Anticoagulant therapy for more than 24 hours
  • Expected survival time <3 months
  • Contraindication to contrast media
  • Pregnancy
  • Geographic inaccessibility precluding follow-up
  • <18 years old

Interventions

Physicians used a clinical model to determine patients’ pretest probability of pulmonary embolism, then performed a D-dimer test

  • Low pretest probability and a negative D-dimer: No further tests, PE excluded
  • All other patients underwent ventilation–perfusion lung scanning
    • If nondiagnostic V-P scan, perform bilateral deep venous ultrasonography
    • Further testing (serial ultrasonography or angiography) was done based on patients' pretest probability and lung scanning results

Outcomes

n=930 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

  • This study used V-P lung scan, which was been replaced with CTA as imaging of choice

See Also

External Links

Review Questions

1 The utility of a quantitative D-dimer test is greatest in which of the following patients suspected of a pulmonary embolism?

Patients with a low pre-test probability
Patients with an intermediate pre-test probability
Patients with a high pre-test probability

2 In which of the following patients can a negative CT pulmonary angiogram (alone) exclude the diagnosis of PE?

A patient with low pretest probability who required additional diagnostic testing because of a positive D-dimer
A patient with an intermediate pretest probability with a negative CT pulmonary angiogram in whom you are still concermed for PE
A patient with an intermediate pretest probability with a negative d-dimer and a negative CT pulmonary angiogram
Neither of the above

3 When would venous ultrasound be indicated as the initial imaging modality when you are evaluating a person with symptoms consistent with PE?

Patients with obvious signs of DVT for whom venous ultrasound is readily available
Patients with borderline renal insufficiency
Patients with CT contrast agent allergy
Pregnant patient
All of the above