EBQ:Wells PE Rule Out: Difference between revisions
(major points) |
(added templates) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Major Points== | ==Major Points== | ||
{ | {{Wells Criteria}} | ||
{{Wells Score}} | |||
==Study Design== | ==Study Design== | ||
Prospective Cohort Study of 4 tertiary care hospitals in Canada | Prospective Cohort Study of 4 tertiary care hospitals in Canada | ||
Revision as of 19:20, 21 September 2015
Under Review Journal Club Article
Wells PS et al. "Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and D-Dimer". Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001. 135(2):98-107.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Is there a simple clinical model along with d-dimer assay testing that can be used to manage patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism?
Conclusion
Patients can be safely managed for suspected pulmonary embolism on the basis of pretest probability and d-dimer
Major Points
Wells Criteria
| Clinical Features | Points |
|---|---|
| Symptoms of DVT (leg swelling and pain with palpation) | 3.0 |
| PE as likely as or more likely than an alternative diagnosis | 3.0 |
| HR >100 bpm | 1.5 |
| Immobilization for >3 consecutive days or surgery in the previous 4 weeks | 1.5 |
| Previous DVT or PE | 1.5 |
| Hemoptysis | 1.0 |
| Malignancy (receiving treatment, treatment stopped within 6 mon, palliative care) | 1.0 |
Two Tier Wells Score
- Score 0-4 = PE Unlikely (12.1% incidence of PE)
- Check D-dimer
- If D-dimer positive then obtain CTPA or V/Q scan
- If D-dimer negative, no further workup needed (0.5% incidence of PE at 3 month follow up)
- Check D-dimer
- Score >4 = PE Likely (37.1% incidence of PE)
- Obtain CT Pulmonary Angiography or V/Q Scan
- New evidence suggests lower Wells Score with D-dimer <1000 ng/mL is effective at ruling out PE without imaging
Study Design
Prospective Cohort Study of 4 tertiary care hospitals in Canada
- Patients were evaluated by 1 of 43 EM physicians
- Physician assigned points according to the Well's criteria points table above
- Physicians were told to use clinical information, CXR, EKG, and whatever blood tests were considered necessary
- Patients received diagnosis of PE if they had high-probability V-P scan, abnormal result on ultrasound or pulmonary angiography, VTE during follow-up
- If the diagnosis of PE was excluded, patients were followed up for 3 months for the development of thromboembolic events
Population
Patient Demographics
Inclusion Criteria
- Consecutive patients presenting to participating EDs
- Suspicion of PE
- Symptoms for <30 days
- Acute onset of new or worsening shortness of breath or chest pain
Exclusion Criteria
- Suspected DVT of the upper extremity as a likely source of PE
- No symptoms of PE within 3 days of presentation
- Anticoagulant therapy for more than 24 hours
- Expected survival time <3 months
- Contraindication to contrast media
- Pregnancy
- Geographic inaccessibility precluding follow-up
- <18 years old
Interventions
Physicians used a clinical model to determine patients’ pretest probability of pulmonary embolism, then performed a D-dimer test
- Low pretest probability and a negative D-dimer: No further tests, PE excluded
- All other patients underwent ventilation–perfusion lung scanning
- If nondiagnostic V-P scan, perform bilateral deep venous ultrasonography
- Further testing (serial ultrasonography or angiography) was done based on patients' pretest probability and lung scanning results
Outcomes
n=930 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
Primary Outcome
Secondary Outcomes
Subgroup analysis
Criticisms & Further Discussion
- This study used V-P lung scan, which was been replaced with CTA as imaging of choice
See Also
External Links
Review Questions
