Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator complication: Difference between revisions
Bobbycarey (talk | contribs) |
Bobbycarey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
**Unipolar Cautery - can cause sensing and pacing malfunction as well as reprogramming | **Unipolar Cautery - can cause sensing and pacing malfunction as well as reprogramming | ||
== | ==Shocks (i.e. Defibrillation)== | ||
*Approximately 1/3 - 1/2 of ICD patients receive a shock within one year of placement<ref>Sears SF Jr., Shea JB, Conti JB. Cardiology patient page. How to respond to an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock. Circulation. 2005;111:e380–e382</ref> | |||
**Generally described by patients as a powerful "kick to the chest" | |||
**Can be very distressing and a source of anxiety for patients | |||
*Inappropriate Shocks | |||
**Causes | |||
***Misclassification by device of SVT or AF as VT or VF | |||
***Electrical Noise | |||
***Fractured Lead | |||
**Can be diagnosed by interrogation of device after a reported shock | |||
*Phantom Shocks | |||
**The perception of a shock without a delivered shock | |||
**Generally described by patients as a mild electrical pain or pain around the defibrillator site | |||
**More common in patients who have never had an actual shock | |||
**Occurs in 9% of patients each year<ref>Berg SK et al. Phantom shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from a randomized rehabilitation trial (COPE-ICD). Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1463-7. Epub 2013 Apr 18.</ref> | |||
==Differential Diagnosis== | ==Differential Diagnosis== | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 10 March 2021
Background
Nomenclature
- All ICDs are also pacemakers (i.e. have pacing functionality) but pacemakers are not ICDs (i.e. do not have shocking functionality)
Parts
- Pulse Generator
- Typically implanted in L upper chest wall
- Contains device hardware and battery
- Acts as a shocking electrode in defibrillation
- Leads
- Insulated and antimicrobial-coated
- Atrial lead
- Pacing and sensing functionality
- Typical bipolar (pacing and sensing are performed by two electrodes, located several millimeters apart at the tip of the lead)
- Right ventricular lead
- Pacing, sensing, and defibrillation functionality
- Has one or two coils to facilitate defibrillation
- Easily identified on Chest X-Ray and can hep differentiate an ICD from a pacemaker
- Typical bipolar (pacing and sensing are performed by two electrodes, located several millimeters apart at the tip of the lead)
- Left Ventricular Lead
- Pacing and sensing functionality
- Bipolar or unipolar (pacing and sensing are performed by one electrode at the tip of the LV lead and a second remote electrode, typically either one of the RV electrodes or the pulse generator)
Indications for ICD implantation
- Secondary Prevention[1]
- Previous episode of unstable VT or VF
- Not indicated if VT/VF occurs <48 hours after myocardial infarction
- Sustained VT in setting of cardiomyopathy or channelopathy
- Previous episode of unstable VT or VF
- Primary Prevention[2]
- Myocardial infarction >40 days ago with LVEF <30%
- Cardiomyopathy + NYHA Functional Class II or III, and LVEF <35%
- Controversy exists over applying the above criteria to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
- Patients with underlying disorders placing them at high risk for unstable VT or VF
- Congenital long QT syndrome
- High-risk HOCM
- Brugada syndrome
- ARVD
- Other channelopathies
- Biventricular ICD (i.e. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy)
- Any of the above with intraventricular conduction delay of >120ms
Functions
- Can perform all functions of pacemakers
- Anti-tachycardia pacing
- In response to a ventricular rate within a pre-set range (typically ~150-220 bpm), the device will compare the ongoing QRS morphology to a saved image of a QRS complex that is known to be a sinus beat; if the ICD algorithm determines that the ongoing morphology is significantly different (i.e. is unlikely to be a sinus tachycardia), it will deliver a series of paced beats at a rate slightly faster than the ongoing rate in an attempt to break the re-entrant cycle
- A device will typically be programmed to attempt anti-tachycardia pacing several times; if unsuccessful, it will move on to defibrillation
- Defibrillation
- Delivery of a large electrical shock (up to 42 joules) from one electrode to the other in response to VT or VF
- Magnet Mode
- Placement of a magnet over the generator will deactivate anti-tachycardia pacing and defibrillation modes as long as the magnet is in place.
- Diagnostics
- Records rhythm strips of AF, VT, and VF episodes for later review
- If anti-tachycardia pacing or defibrillation has occurred, there will be a large alert on the device's interrogation home screen
- Keeps track of % of paced vs intrinsic beats
- Keeps a rate histogram, as well as % of time spent in AF
- Records rhythm strips of AF, VT, and VF episodes for later review
Methods to Identify Manufacturer
- Patient should carry a pocket card indicating manufacturer
- Manufacturer Hotline has patient database
- Medtronic Inc. (1-800-328-2518)
- St. Jude Medical Inc. (recently acquired by Abbott, Inc.) (1-800-722-3774)
- Boston Scientific Inc. (1-800-227-3422)
- Magnet mode
- Does not help differentiate ICDs (different than pacemakers)
Electromagnetic Interference
- Nonmedical
- Cell phones: do not interact with device
- Airport security: may trigger alarm, no alteration of activity
- Medical Sources
- MRI: mostly safe, consult cards on device specific recs
- Cardioversion: Use AP pads >8cm from device to minimize adverse effects
- Unipolar Cautery - can cause sensing and pacing malfunction as well as reprogramming
Shocks (i.e. Defibrillation)
- Approximately 1/3 - 1/2 of ICD patients receive a shock within one year of placement[3]
- Generally described by patients as a powerful "kick to the chest"
- Can be very distressing and a source of anxiety for patients
- Inappropriate Shocks
- Causes
- Misclassification by device of SVT or AF as VT or VF
- Electrical Noise
- Fractured Lead
- Can be diagnosed by interrogation of device after a reported shock
- Causes
- Phantom Shocks
- The perception of a shock without a delivered shock
- Generally described by patients as a mild electrical pain or pain around the defibrillator site
- More common in patients who have never had an actual shock
- Occurs in 9% of patients each year[4]
Differential Diagnosis
Evaluation
Management
Disposition
- Consider discharge if:
- Single shock only
- Currently asymptomatic
- No concerning associated symptoms (e.g. chest pain, dyspnea, syncope)
- Admit all others
See Also
External Links
References
- ↑ Al-Khatib SM et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(14):e91. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
- ↑ Al-Khatib SM et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(14):e91. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
- ↑ Sears SF Jr., Shea JB, Conti JB. Cardiology patient page. How to respond to an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock. Circulation. 2005;111:e380–e382
- ↑ Berg SK et al. Phantom shocks in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from a randomized rehabilitation trial (COPE-ICD). Europace. 2013 Oct;15(10):1463-7. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
