Appendicitis: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(Embed Alvarado Calculator on clinical page)
 
(108 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Background ==
==Background==
*Most common nonobstetric surgical emergency in pregnancy
*'''Most common surgical emergency''' worldwide
*Most commonly caused by luminal obstruction by a fecalith
*Lifetime risk: ~7-8% (peak incidence ages 10-30)
*There are no historical or physical exam findings that can definitively rule out appy
*Pathophysiology: luminal obstruction (fecalith, lymphoid hyperplasia, rarely tumor) → bacterial overgrowth → wall inflammation → ischemia → perforation
== Clinical Features ==
*Perforation risk increases with time: ~2% at 24 hours, increasing to ~50% by 72 hours
*Early on primarily malaise, indigestion, anorexia
*Atypical presentations common in: children, elderly, pregnant women, immunocompromised
**Later pt develops abdominal pain
***Initially vague, periumbilical (visceral innervation)  
***Later migrates to McBurney point (parietal innervation)
*Nausea, w/ or w/o emesis, typically follows onset of pain
*Fever may or not occur
*Urinary symptoms common given proximity of appendix to urinary tract (sterile pyuria)  
*Sudden improvement suggests perforation  
*33% of pts have atypical presentation
**Retrocecal appendix can cause flank or pelvic pain
**Gravid uterus sometimes displaces appendix superiorly -> RUQ pain
== Physical Exam ==
*Rovsing sign (palpation of LLQ worsens RLQ pain)
*Psoas sign (extension of R leg at hip while pt lies on L side elicits abd pain)
*Obturator sign (internal and external rotation of thigh at hip elicits pain
*Peritonitis suggested by:  
**Right heel strike elicits pain
**Guarding


==Clinical Examination Operating Characteristics==
==Clinical Features==
{| width="200" border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1"
===Classic Presentation===
|-
*Periumbilical pain migrating to RLQ over 12-24 hours (migration is most specific historical feature)
| Procedure
*Anorexia (nearly universal; absence should raise doubt)
| LR+
*Nausea, vomiting (usually after onset of pain)
| LR-
*Low-grade [[fever]] (high fever suggests perforation/abscess)
|-
| RLQ pain
| 7.3-8.4
| 0-0.28
|-
| Rigidity
| 3.76
| 0.82
|-
| Migration
| 3.18
| 0.50
|-
| Pain before vomiting
| 2.76
| NA
|-
| Psoas sign
| 2.38
| 0.90
|-
| Fever
| 1.94
| 0.58
|-
| Rebound
| 1.1-6.3
| 0-0.86
|-
| Guarding
| 1.65-1.78
| 0-0.54
|-
| No similar pain previously
| 1.5
| 0.32
|-
| Anorexia
| 1.27
| 0.64
|-
| Nausea
| 0.69-1.2
| 0.70-0.84
|-
| Vomiting
| 0.92
| 1.12
|}


== Diagnosis ==
===Physical Exam===
*McBurney point tenderness (1/3 distance from ASIS to umbilicus)
*Rovsing sign: RLQ pain with LLQ palpation
*Psoas sign: RLQ pain with right hip extension (retrocecal appendix)
*Obturator sign: RLQ pain with internal rotation of flexed right hip (pelvic appendix)
*Rebound tenderness and guarding (peritoneal irritation)
*Dunphy sign: increased pain with coughing


===Atypical Presentations===
*Retrocecal appendix (~30%): flank or back pain, positive psoas sign, less peritoneal irritation
*Pelvic appendix: suprapubic pain, urinary symptoms, diarrhea
*Pregnant women: RUQ pain (displaced appendix); less peritoneal signs; higher perforation rate<ref>Mourad J, et al. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. ''Am J Obstet Gynecol''. 2000;182(5):1027-1029. PMID 10819817</ref>
*Elderly: delayed presentation, less fever, higher perforation rate (~50%)
*Children <5: nonspecific symptoms; perforation common by presentation


== Work-Up ==
==Differential Diagnosis==
#Labs
*[[Mesenteric adenitis]] (children — viral)
##CBC
*[[Ovarian torsion]], ruptured [[ovarian cyst]], [[ectopic pregnancy]]
###Normal WBC does not rule-out appy
*[[Crohn's disease]] (terminal ileitis)
##UA
*[[Diverticulitis]] (right-sided in Asian patients, cecal)
###Sterile pyuria or hematuria c/w appy
*[[Cholecystitis]], [[nephrolithiasis]], [[UTI]]
##Urine pregnancy
*[[Pelvic inflammatory disease]]
##CRP
*Epiploic appendagitis, omental infarction
###Normal CRP AND WBC makes appy very unlikely
*[[Testicular torsion]]
#Imaging
##Early sx consultation should be obtained before imaging in straightforward cases
##Not universally necessary; consider in:
###Women of reproductive age
###Men w/ equivocal presentation
##Modality
###US
####First choice for pregnant women and children
####Findings: noncompressible appendix >6mm in diameter
###CT
####First choice for adult males and nonpregnant women
== DDx ==
[[Abdominal Pain#RLQ]]


== Treatment ==
{{RLQ pain DDX}}


== Disposition ==
==Evaluation==
===Labs===
*WBC: elevated in ~80% (but normal WBC does NOT exclude appendicitis)
*CRP: elevated; combined normal WBC + normal CRP has high NPV
*Urinalysis: mild pyuria/hematuria may occur (inflammation adjacent to ureter) — does not exclude appendicitis
*Pregnancy test in all reproductive-age women
*Lipase if epigastric component


== See Also ==
===Clinical Decision Rules===
*Alvarado Score (MANTRELS): Migration, Anorexia, Nausea, Tenderness RLQ, Rebound, Elevation of temp, Leukocytosis, Shift to left
**Score ≤3: low risk; 4-6: moderate; ≥7: high probability
*AIR Score (Appendicitis Inflammatory Response): incorporates CRP
*'''These scores help risk-stratify but do NOT replace clinical judgment'''


== Source ==
===Imaging===
====CT Abdomen/Pelvis with IV Contrast (Test of Choice in Adults)====
*Sensitivity 94-98%, specificity 95%
*Findings: enlarged appendix > 6 mm diameter, periappendiceal fat stranding, appendicolith, wall enhancement
*Signs of perforation: abscess, extraluminal air, phlegmon
*Oral contrast generally NOT needed
 
====Ultrasound (First-line in Pediatrics and Pregnancy)====
*Sensitivity 86%, specificity 81% (operator dependent)
*Findings: non-compressible appendix > 6 mm, target sign, periappendiceal fluid
*If US equivocal in pediatrics: MRI preferred over CT to avoid radiation
 
====MRI (Alternative in Pregnancy)====
*Sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%
*Preferred over CT in pregnancy (no radiation)
 
==Management==
===Uncomplicated Appendicitis===
*'''NPO, IV fluids, pain control''' (analgesics do NOT mask peritoneal signs)
*Pre-operative antibiotics: cefoxitin 2g IV or ceftriaxone + metronidazole
*Laparoscopic appendectomy (standard of care)
*Antibiotics-first approach: emerging evidence supports nonoperative management with antibiotics alone for selected uncomplicated appendicitis (CODA trial)<ref>CODA Collaborative. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. ''N Engl J Med''. 2020;383(20):1907-1919. PMID 33017106</ref>
**~30% failure/recurrence rate at 1 year
**Shared decision-making with patient and surgeon
 
===Complicated Appendicitis (Perforated/Abscess)===
*Broad-spectrum antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375-4.5g IV OR ceftriaxone + metronidazole
*Small phlegmon/abscess (<3 cm): antibiotics + interval appendectomy in 6-8 weeks
*Large abscess (>3 cm): CT-guided percutaneous drainage + antibiotics + interval appendectomy
*Peritonitis/sepsis: emergent appendectomy
 
==Disposition==
*Surgical consultation for all confirmed or highly suspected appendicitis
*Admit for surgical management
*If appendicitis suspected but imaging equivocal: observation with serial exams or repeat imaging in 6-12 hours
*Discharge with close follow-up only if alternative diagnosis confirmed and appendicitis reliably excluded
 
== Calculators ==
{{Alvarado Calculator}}
 
==See Also==
*[[Abdominal pain]]
*[[Appendicitis (peds)]]
*[[Abdominal pain (peds)]]
*[[Surgical abdomen]]
 
==References==
<references/>
*Di Saverio S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. ''World J Emerg Surg''. 2020;15:27. PMID 32295644
*Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. ''Lancet''. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287. PMID 26460662
*Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. ''Ann Emerg Med''. 1986;15(5):557-564. PMID 3963537


[[Category:GI]]
[[Category:GI]]
[[Category:Surgery]]

Latest revision as of 09:55, 22 March 2026

Background

  • Most common surgical emergency worldwide
  • Lifetime risk: ~7-8% (peak incidence ages 10-30)
  • Pathophysiology: luminal obstruction (fecalith, lymphoid hyperplasia, rarely tumor) → bacterial overgrowth → wall inflammation → ischemia → perforation
  • Perforation risk increases with time: ~2% at 24 hours, increasing to ~50% by 72 hours
  • Atypical presentations common in: children, elderly, pregnant women, immunocompromised

Clinical Features

Classic Presentation

  • Periumbilical pain migrating to RLQ over 12-24 hours (migration is most specific historical feature)
  • Anorexia (nearly universal; absence should raise doubt)
  • Nausea, vomiting (usually after onset of pain)
  • Low-grade fever (high fever suggests perforation/abscess)

Physical Exam

  • McBurney point tenderness (1/3 distance from ASIS to umbilicus)
  • Rovsing sign: RLQ pain with LLQ palpation
  • Psoas sign: RLQ pain with right hip extension (retrocecal appendix)
  • Obturator sign: RLQ pain with internal rotation of flexed right hip (pelvic appendix)
  • Rebound tenderness and guarding (peritoneal irritation)
  • Dunphy sign: increased pain with coughing

Atypical Presentations

  • Retrocecal appendix (~30%): flank or back pain, positive psoas sign, less peritoneal irritation
  • Pelvic appendix: suprapubic pain, urinary symptoms, diarrhea
  • Pregnant women: RUQ pain (displaced appendix); less peritoneal signs; higher perforation rate[1]
  • Elderly: delayed presentation, less fever, higher perforation rate (~50%)
  • Children <5: nonspecific symptoms; perforation common by presentation

Differential Diagnosis

Template:RLQ pain DDX

Evaluation

Labs

  • WBC: elevated in ~80% (but normal WBC does NOT exclude appendicitis)
  • CRP: elevated; combined normal WBC + normal CRP has high NPV
  • Urinalysis: mild pyuria/hematuria may occur (inflammation adjacent to ureter) — does not exclude appendicitis
  • Pregnancy test in all reproductive-age women
  • Lipase if epigastric component

Clinical Decision Rules

  • Alvarado Score (MANTRELS): Migration, Anorexia, Nausea, Tenderness RLQ, Rebound, Elevation of temp, Leukocytosis, Shift to left
    • Score ≤3: low risk; 4-6: moderate; ≥7: high probability
  • AIR Score (Appendicitis Inflammatory Response): incorporates CRP
  • These scores help risk-stratify but do NOT replace clinical judgment

Imaging

CT Abdomen/Pelvis with IV Contrast (Test of Choice in Adults)

  • Sensitivity 94-98%, specificity 95%
  • Findings: enlarged appendix > 6 mm diameter, periappendiceal fat stranding, appendicolith, wall enhancement
  • Signs of perforation: abscess, extraluminal air, phlegmon
  • Oral contrast generally NOT needed

Ultrasound (First-line in Pediatrics and Pregnancy)

  • Sensitivity 86%, specificity 81% (operator dependent)
  • Findings: non-compressible appendix > 6 mm, target sign, periappendiceal fluid
  • If US equivocal in pediatrics: MRI preferred over CT to avoid radiation

MRI (Alternative in Pregnancy)

  • Sensitivity 94%, specificity 97%
  • Preferred over CT in pregnancy (no radiation)

Management

Uncomplicated Appendicitis

  • NPO, IV fluids, pain control (analgesics do NOT mask peritoneal signs)
  • Pre-operative antibiotics: cefoxitin 2g IV or ceftriaxone + metronidazole
  • Laparoscopic appendectomy (standard of care)
  • Antibiotics-first approach: emerging evidence supports nonoperative management with antibiotics alone for selected uncomplicated appendicitis (CODA trial)[2]
    • ~30% failure/recurrence rate at 1 year
    • Shared decision-making with patient and surgeon

Complicated Appendicitis (Perforated/Abscess)

  • Broad-spectrum antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam 3.375-4.5g IV OR ceftriaxone + metronidazole
  • Small phlegmon/abscess (<3 cm): antibiotics + interval appendectomy in 6-8 weeks
  • Large abscess (>3 cm): CT-guided percutaneous drainage + antibiotics + interval appendectomy
  • Peritonitis/sepsis: emergent appendectomy

Disposition

  • Surgical consultation for all confirmed or highly suspected appendicitis
  • Admit for surgical management
  • If appendicitis suspected but imaging equivocal: observation with serial exams or repeat imaging in 6-12 hours
  • Discharge with close follow-up only if alternative diagnosis confirmed and appendicitis reliably excluded

Calculators

Alvarado Score

Alvarado Score (MANTRELS)
Criteria Points No Yes
Symptoms
Migration of pain to RLQ +1 1
Anorexia +1 1
Nausea/vomiting +1 1
Signs
Tenderness in RLQ +2 1
Rebound pain +1 1
Elevated temperature (≥37.3°C / 99.1°F) +1 1
Labs
Leukocytosis (WBC >10,000/μL) +2 1
Left shift (>75% neutrophils) +1 1
Alvarado Score / 10
Interpretation
0–4 Low riskAppendicitis unlikely. Consider other diagnoses.
5–6 Equivocal — Consider CT imaging or observation with serial exams.
7–8 Probable appendicitis — Surgical consultation recommended.
9–10 Very probable appendicitis — Operative management almost certain.

See Also

References

  1. Mourad J, et al. Appendicitis in pregnancy: new information that contradicts long-held clinical beliefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(5):1027-1029. PMID 10819817
  2. CODA Collaborative. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(20):1907-1919. PMID 33017106
  • Di Saverio S, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27. PMID 32295644
  • Bhangu A, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287. PMID 26460662
  • Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(5):557-564. PMID 3963537