PERC rule: Difference between revisions

(Created page with "Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out (PERC) Criteria If all BREATHS are present AND low suspicion for PE, no D-dimer needed: B- No blood in sputum R- room air sat > 95% E- No estrogen...")
 
(Text replacement - " PE " to " PE ")
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out (PERC) Criteria
==Background==
*Use only if you would be confident in excluding [[PE]] with a neg D-dimer
*If all are present AND low suspicion for PE, no D-dimer needed:


If all BREATHS are present AND low suspicion for PE, no D-dimer needed:
{{PERC rule}}


B- No blood in sputum
==Validation==
*Validated on 7527 patients
**Only 0.9% had [[PE]] when PERC negative, no deaths


R- room air sat > 95%
==See Also==
[[Pulmonary Embolism (PE)]]


E- No estrogen or hormone use
==External Links==
*[http://www.mdcalc.com/perc-rule-for-pulmonary-embolism/ MDCalc - PERC for Pulmonary Embolism]


A- Age < 50
==See Also==
*[[EBQ:PERC Rule Validation]]


T- No  prior DVT or PE
==References==
<references/>


H- Heart rate < 100bpm
[[Category:Pulmonary]]
 
S- No surgery/trauma requiring hospitalization in past 4 weeks
 
 
Note: Inclusion Criteria
 
Use this criteria if confident in excluding PE with negative D-dimer
 
Patient with dyspnea and PE was not felt to be the most likely Dx:
 
    -very low risk group ~2% overall PE risk
 
 
Note: Exclusion
 
DO NOT use if negative D-dimer does not r/o PE
 
 
Validated on 7527 patients found 96% sensitive in detecting PE
 
0.9% had PE, 0 died when all BREATHS present
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Pulm]]

Latest revision as of 19:23, 27 January 2017

Background

  • Use only if you would be confident in excluding PE with a neg D-dimer
  • If all are present AND low suspicion for PE, no D-dimer needed:

PERC Rule Calculator

Check all of the following that are true:

  • Age <50yr
  • Pulse ox >94% (room air)
  • HR <100
  • No prior PE or DVT
  • No recent surgery or trauma (within prior 4wk)
  • No hemoptysis
  • No estrogen use
  • No unilateral leg swelling

In patients with low suspicion for PE (best-guess pre-test probability <15%) AND all are true, only 0.9% had PE (n=7527) and it can be ruled-out without further testing (i.e. no need for d-dimer)[1][2]

Validation

  • Validated on 7527 patients
    • Only 0.9% had PE when PERC negative, no deaths

See Also

Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

External Links

See Also

References

  1. Kline JA, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2: 1247–55.
  2. Kline JA, et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 772–80. (PMID: 18318689).