Appendicitis: Difference between revisions
ClaireLewis (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adult top}} [[appendicitis (peds)]] | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
*Most common | [[File:Appendix locations.png|thumb|Drawing of colon with variability of appendix locations as seen from anterior view.]] | ||
*Acute inflammation of the vermiform appendix | |||
*Most common non-obstetric surgical emergency in pregnancy | |||
*Most common abdominal surgical emergency in patients <50 | |||
*Most common between 10-30 years, but no age is exempt | |||
*Most commonly caused by luminal obstruction by a fecalith | *Most commonly caused by luminal obstruction by a fecalith | ||
*There are no historical or physical exam findings that can definitively rule out | *There are no historical or physical exam findings that can definitively rule out appendicitis | ||
==Clinical Features== | ==Clinical Features== | ||
[[File:McBurney's point.jpg|thumb|Location of McBurney's point (1), located two thirds the distance from the umbilicus (2) to the right anterior superior iliac spine (3).]] | |||
===History=== | ===History=== | ||
*Early on primarily malaise, indigestion, anorexia | *Early on primarily malaise, indigestion, anorexia | ||
**Later patient develops [[abdominal pain]] | **Later patient develops [[abdominal pain]] | ||
***Initially vague, periumbilical (visceral innervation) | ***Initially vague, periumbilical (visceral innervation) | ||
***Later migrates to McBurney point (parietal innervation) | ***Later migrates to McBurney point (parietal innervation) | ||
*** <50% of patients have this typical presentation | |||
*[[Nausea]], with or with out emesis, typically follows onset of pain | *[[Nausea]], with or with out emesis, typically follows onset of pain | ||
*[[Fever]] may or not occur | *[[Fever]] may or not occur | ||
| Line 16: | Line 22: | ||
*Sudden improvement suggests perforation | *Sudden improvement suggests perforation | ||
*33% of patients have atypical presentation | *33% of patients have atypical presentation | ||
**Retrocecal appendix can cause flank or pelvic pain | **Retrocecal appendix can cause [[flank pain|flank]] or [[pelvic pain]] | ||
**Gravid uterus sometimes displaces appendix superiorly → [[RUQ pain]] | **Gravid uterus sometimes displaces appendix superiorly → [[RUQ pain]] | ||
===Physical Exam=== | ===Physical Exam=== | ||
*McBurney's: maximal tenderness to palpation 2/3 of the way between umbilicus and right anterior superior iliac spine | |||
*Rovsing sign (palpation of LLQ worsens RLQ pain) | *Rovsing sign (palpation of LLQ worsens RLQ pain) | ||
*Psoas sign (extension of right leg at hip while patient lies on left side elicits abdominal pain) | *Psoas sign (extension of right leg at hip while patient lies on left side elicits abdominal pain) | ||
| Line 26: | Line 33: | ||
**Right heel strike elicits pain | **Right heel strike elicits pain | ||
**Guarding | **Guarding | ||
**Rebound | |||
**Rigidity | |||
===Clinical Examination Operating Characteristics=== | ===Clinical Examination Operating Characteristics=== | ||
| Line 87: | Line 96: | ||
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== | ||
[[File:Appendicitis_Jarrett_Subramaniam.gif|thumbnail|Dilated, non-compressible appendix with appendicolith and surrounding free fluid<ref>http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/</ref>]] | |||
[[File:AppendicitisMark.png|thumb|Peri-appendiceal fat stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]] | |||
[[File:X-ray showing fecalith which has caused appendicitis.jpg|thumb|Fecalith (arrow) and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]] | |||
[[File:CAT scan demonstrating acute appendicitis.jpg|thumb|Dialated appendix and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]] | |||
===Appendicitis Risk Scores=== | |||
{{Alvarado scoring system}} | |||
===Labs=== | ===Labs=== | ||
*CBC | *Abdominal panel | ||
**Normal WBC does not rule-out | **CBC | ||
***Normal WBC does not rule-out appendicitis | |||
***Only 80% of patients will have leukocytosis with left shift<ref>Khan MN, Davie E, Irshad K. The role of white cell count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2004;16(3):17-19.</ref> | |||
**Chemistry | |||
**Consider LFTs + lipase | |||
**Consider coagulation studies (PT, PTT, INR), as a marker of liver function | |||
*Urine pregnancy | |||
*[[Urinalysis]] | *[[Urinalysis]] | ||
** | **Leukocytes will be present in 40% of patients<ref>Baird DLH, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. Acute appendicitis. BMJ. 2017;357:j1703. Published 2017 Apr 19. doi:10.1136/bmj.j1703</ref> | ||
* | *Consider [[serum lactate]] | ||
*CRP | **Does not necessarily define level of severity (if appendicitis is present.) | ||
**Normal CRP AND WBC makes | **Can aid in trending effective resuscitation once the diagnosis is made. | ||
*Consider CRP | |||
**Normal CRP AND WBC makes appendicitis unlikely | |||
===Imaging=== | ===Imaging=== | ||
| Line 102: | Line 126: | ||
**Men with equivocal presentation | **Men with equivocal presentation | ||
*Perforation may result in false negative study | *Perforation may result in false negative study | ||
* | *Imaging modalities | ||
**[[Ultrasound: Abdomen|Ultrasound]] | **[[Ultrasound: Abdomen|Ultrasound]] | ||
***First choice for pregnant women and children | ***First choice for pregnant women and children | ||
***Limitations: operator-dependent, difficult to visualize with obesity, gravid uterus, bowel gas, guarding, lack of patient cooperation | ***Limitations: operator-dependent, difficult to visualize with obesity, gravid uterus, bowel gas, guarding, lack of patient cooperation | ||
| Line 115: | Line 138: | ||
**MRI | **MRI | ||
***When unable to identify appendix in children or pregnant women | ***When unable to identify appendix in children or pregnant women | ||
==Management== | ==Management== | ||
| Line 160: | Line 154: | ||
==Disposition== | ==Disposition== | ||
Admission | *Admission | ||
==Complications== | ==Complications== | ||
* | |||
===Infection=== | |||
*Either a simple wound infection or an intraabdominal abscess | |||
**Typically in patients with perforated appendicitis | **Typically in patients with perforated appendicitis | ||
===Recurrent appendicitis=== | |||
*Occurs in approximately 1:50,000 appendectomies <ref>Hendahewa R. et al. The dilemma of stump appendicitis - a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015; 14: 101-3.</ref> | |||
*Typically caused by inflammation of the remaining appendiceal stump | |||
**Can also be caused by a retained piece of the appendix not removed during surgery <ref>Boardman T. et al. Recurrent appendicitis caused by a retained appendiceal tip: A case report. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019; 57: 232-4.</ref> | |||
*Can present similar to primary appendicitis | |||
*Treatment similar to that of primary appendicitis and likely requires surgical revision of the appendiceal stump or removal of retained tissue | |||
*Delay in diagnosis and treatment can result in perforation and sepsis | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
| Line 171: | Line 175: | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
*[http://www.chop.edu/clinical-pathway/appendicitis-without-known-gi-disease-clinical-pathway CHOP Appendicitis Pathway] | *[http://www.chop.edu/clinical-pathway/appendicitis-without-known-gi-disease-clinical-pathway CHOP Appendicitis Pathway] | ||
*[https://www.acep.org/patient-care/clinical-policies/appendicitis/ ACEP Clinical Policy Statement] | |||
*[http://www.emdocs.net/appendicitis-why-do-we-miss-it-and-how-do-we-improve/ emDocs - Appendicitis: Why Do We Miss It, and How Do We Improve?] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
| Line 176: | Line 182: | ||
[[Category:GI]] | [[Category:GI]] | ||
[[Category:Surgery]] | [[Category:Surgery]] | ||
[[Category:ID]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:38, 14 February 2024
This page is for adult patients. For pediatric patients, see: appendicitis (peds)
Background
- Acute inflammation of the vermiform appendix
- Most common non-obstetric surgical emergency in pregnancy
- Most common abdominal surgical emergency in patients <50
- Most common between 10-30 years, but no age is exempt
- Most commonly caused by luminal obstruction by a fecalith
- There are no historical or physical exam findings that can definitively rule out appendicitis
Clinical Features
History
- Early on primarily malaise, indigestion, anorexia
- Later patient develops abdominal pain
- Initially vague, periumbilical (visceral innervation)
- Later migrates to McBurney point (parietal innervation)
- <50% of patients have this typical presentation
- Later patient develops abdominal pain
- Nausea, with or with out emesis, typically follows onset of pain
- Fever may or not occur
- Urinary symptoms common given proximity of appendix to urinary tract (sterile pyuria)
- Sudden improvement suggests perforation
- 33% of patients have atypical presentation
- Retrocecal appendix can cause flank or pelvic pain
- Gravid uterus sometimes displaces appendix superiorly → RUQ pain
Physical Exam
- McBurney's: maximal tenderness to palpation 2/3 of the way between umbilicus and right anterior superior iliac spine
- Rovsing sign (palpation of LLQ worsens RLQ pain)
- Psoas sign (extension of right leg at hip while patient lies on left side elicits abdominal pain)
- Obturator sign (internal and external rotation of thigh at hip elicits pain
- Peritonitis suggested by:
- Right heel strike elicits pain
- Guarding
- Rebound
- Rigidity
Clinical Examination Operating Characteristics
| Procedure | LR+ | LR- |
| RLQ pain | 7.3-8.4 | 0-0.28 |
| Rigidity | 3.76 | 0.82 |
| Migration | 3.18 | 0.50 |
| Pain before vomiting | 2.76 | NA |
| Psoas sign | 2.38 | 0.90 |
| Fever | 1.94 | 0.58 |
| Rebound | 1.1-6.3 | 0-0.86 |
| Guarding | 1.65-1.78 | 0-0.54 |
| No similar pain previously | 1.5 | 0.32 |
| Anorexia | 1.27 | 0.64 |
| Nausea | 0.69-1.2 | 0.70-0.84 |
| Vomiting | 0.92 | 1.12 |
Differential Diagnosis
RLQ Pain
- GI
- Appendicitis
- Perforated appendicitis
- Peritonitis
- Crohn's disease (terminal ileitis)
- Diverticulitis (cecal, Asian patients)
- Inguinal hernia
- Mesenteric ischemia
- Ischemic colitis
- Meckel's diverticulum
- Neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis)
- Appendicitis
- GU
- Other
Evaluation
Appendicitis Risk Scores
Alvarado Clinical Scoring System
| Right Lower Quadrant Tenderness | +2 |
| Elevated Temperature (37.3°C or 99.1°F) | +1 |
| Rebound Tenderness | +1 |
| Migration of Pain to the Right Lower Quadrant | +1 |
| Anorexia | +1 |
| Nausea or Vomiting | +1 |
| Leukocytosis > 10,000 | +2 |
| Leukocyte Left Shift | +1 |
Clinical scoring system, where a score (Total=10) is composed on presence/absence of 3 signs, 3 symptoms and 2 lab values to help guide in case management.
- ≤3 = Appendicitis unlikely
- ≥7 = Surgical consultation
- 4-6 = Consider CT
MANTRELS Mnemonic: Migration to the right iliac fossa, Anorexia, Nausea/Vomiting, Tenderness in the right iliac fossa, Rebound pain, Elevated temperature (fever), Leukocytosis, and Shift of leukocytes to the left (factors listed in the same order as presented above).
Labs
- Abdominal panel
- CBC
- Normal WBC does not rule-out appendicitis
- Only 80% of patients will have leukocytosis with left shift[2]
- Chemistry
- Consider LFTs + lipase
- Consider coagulation studies (PT, PTT, INR), as a marker of liver function
- CBC
- Urine pregnancy
- Urinalysis
- Leukocytes will be present in 40% of patients[3]
- Consider serum lactate
- Does not necessarily define level of severity (if appendicitis is present.)
- Can aid in trending effective resuscitation once the diagnosis is made.
- Consider CRP
- Normal CRP AND WBC makes appendicitis unlikely
Imaging
- Early surgical consultation should be obtained before imaging in straightforward cases
- Not universally necessary; consider in:
- Women of reproductive age
- Men with equivocal presentation
- Perforation may result in false negative study
- Imaging modalities
- Ultrasound
- First choice for pregnant women and children
- Limitations: operator-dependent, difficult to visualize with obesity, gravid uterus, bowel gas, guarding, lack of patient cooperation
- Findings: noncompressible appendix >6mm in diameter, wall thickness greater or equal to 3 mm
- Other supportive findings: aperistalsis, distinct wall layers, target appearance in axial view, appendicolith, periappendiceal fluid, prominent echogenic periappendiceal fat
- CT
- First choice for adult males and nonpregnant women with equivocal cases
- Women derive the greatest benefit from preoperative imaging (lower neg appy rate)
- Contrast (both PO and IV) is unnecessary but typically ordered
- MRI
- When unable to identify appendix in children or pregnant women
- Ultrasound
Management
Supportive Management
- NPO status
- Fluid resuscitation
- Analgesia/antiemetics
Antibiotics
Coverage should extend to E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, and Bacteroides (an anaerobe)
Adult Simple Appendicitis
Antibiotic prophylaxis should be coordinated with surgical consult
Options:
- Cefoxitin 2g IV q6 hours OR
- Cefotetan 2g IV q12 hours OR
- Moxifloxacin 400mg IV once daily OR
- Ertapenem 1g IV once daily
Pediatric Simple Appendicitis
Options:
- Cefoxitin 40mg/kg IV q6 hours
- Cefotetan 40mg/kg IV q12 hours
- Gentamicin 2.5mg/kg IV q8hrs +
- Metronidazole 7.5mg/kg IV 16hrs OR
- Clindamycin 10mg/kg IV q8hrs
Complicated Appendicitis
Defined as perforation, abscess, or phlegmon
Options:
- Metronidazole 500 mg IV q8hrs +
- Cefepime 50 mg/kg IV q12hrs OR
- Ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q12hrs OR
- Levofloxacin 750 mg IV q24hrs OR
- Aztreonam 30 mg/kg IV q8hrs
- Imipenem/Cilastatin 25 mg/kg IV q6hrs (max 500mg)
- Meropenem 20 mg/kg IV q8hrs (max 1g)
- Piperacillin/Tazobactam 100 mg/kg (max 4.5g) IV q8hrs
Cautious use should be applied to use of fluoroquinolones in complicated pediatric appendicitis due to the risk of tendon injury
Surgery
- Open laparotomy or laparoscopy
- Patients who present <72 hours after the onset of symptoms usually undergo immediate appendectomy
- Patients who present >72hrs and have perforated appendix may be treated initially with antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and bowel rest
Disposition
- Admission
Complications
Infection
- Either a simple wound infection or an intraabdominal abscess
- Typically in patients with perforated appendicitis
Recurrent appendicitis
- Occurs in approximately 1:50,000 appendectomies [4]
- Typically caused by inflammation of the remaining appendiceal stump
- Can also be caused by a retained piece of the appendix not removed during surgery [5]
- Can present similar to primary appendicitis
- Treatment similar to that of primary appendicitis and likely requires surgical revision of the appendiceal stump or removal of retained tissue
- Delay in diagnosis and treatment can result in perforation and sepsis
See Also
External Links
- CHOP Appendicitis Pathway
- ACEP Clinical Policy Statement
- emDocs - Appendicitis: Why Do We Miss It, and How Do We Improve?
References
- ↑ http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/
- ↑ Khan MN, Davie E, Irshad K. The role of white cell count and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2004;16(3):17-19.
- ↑ Baird DLH, Simillis C, Kontovounisios C, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. Acute appendicitis. BMJ. 2017;357:j1703. Published 2017 Apr 19. doi:10.1136/bmj.j1703
- ↑ Hendahewa R. et al. The dilemma of stump appendicitis - a case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015; 14: 101-3.
- ↑ Boardman T. et al. Recurrent appendicitis caused by a retained appendiceal tip: A case report. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019; 57: 232-4.
