Intussusception: Difference between revisions
(Expanded: POCUS technique details, rule of 3s for reduction, Dance sign, rotavirus vaccine association, ileo-ileal management, updated references with PMIDs) |
(Strip excess bold) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
[[File:Intussusception EN.png|thumb|Schematic of intussusception.]] | [[File:Intussusception EN.png|thumb|Schematic of intussusception.]] | ||
*Most common cause of intestinal obstruction in | *Most common cause of intestinal obstruction in 6 months to 6 years | ||
**Peak incidence at | **Peak incidence at 6-36 months | ||
*Telescoping of proximal bowel segment (intussusceptum) into distal segment (intussuscipiens) | *Telescoping of proximal bowel segment (intussusceptum) into distal segment (intussuscipiens) | ||
** | **Ileocolic type is most common in children | ||
**Mesenteric involvement leads to venous congestion → ischemia → bloody/mucous stool | **Mesenteric involvement leads to venous congestion → ischemia → bloody/mucous stool | ||
===Pediatrics=== | ===Pediatrics=== | ||
*Typically | *Typically no pathologic lead point (idiopathic in ~90% of cases <3 years) | ||
*If | *If > 6 years old, more likely to have a lead point: | ||
**Meckel diverticulum, duplication cyst, polyp, lymphoma, [[Henoch-Schonlein purpura]] (HSP) hematoma, Peyer patch hypertrophy | **Meckel diverticulum, duplication cyst, polyp, lymphoma, [[Henoch-Schonlein purpura]] (HSP) hematoma, Peyer patch hypertrophy | ||
*Often preceded by viral URI or [[gastroenteritis]] (lymphoid hyperplasia) | *Often preceded by viral URI or [[gastroenteritis]] (lymphoid hyperplasia) | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
*Rare; accounts for 1-5% of bowel obstruction in adults | *Rare; accounts for 1-5% of bowel obstruction in adults | ||
*80% involve small bowel | *80% involve small bowel | ||
* | *70% associated with pathologic lead point (malignancy in up to 50% of colonic cases) | ||
==Clinical Features== | ==Clinical Features== | ||
===Pediatrics=== | ===Pediatrics=== | ||
* | *Intermittent, colicky abdominal pain with episodes every 15-20 minutes | ||
**Child draws knees to chest during episodes | **Child draws knees to chest during episodes | ||
** | **Asymptomatic intervals between episodes (child may appear well and playful) | ||
*[[Vomiting]] (initially non-bilious; bilious in late stages) | *[[Vomiting]] (initially non-bilious; bilious in late stages) | ||
* | *Lethargy may be sole presentation ("neurologic intussusception") | ||
**May present with isolated seizure and abdominal pain<ref>Kleizen KJ et al. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(11):1822-4. PMID 19664012</ref> | **May present with isolated seizure and abdominal pain<ref>Kleizen KJ et al. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(11):1822-4. PMID 19664012</ref> | ||
*Classic triad present in | *Classic triad present in only ~21% of cases<ref>Bruce J, et al. Intussusception: evolution of current management. ''J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr''. 1987;6:663-674. PMID 3430268</ref>: | ||
**Sudden colicky abdominal pain | **Sudden colicky abdominal pain | ||
**Palpable | **Palpable sausage-shaped mass (right upper quadrant/epigastric) | ||
** | **Currant jelly stool (only ~50%; late finding indicating mucosal ischemia) | ||
* | *Dance sign: emptiness in RLQ (cecum displaced superiorly) | ||
*Late: peritonitis, [[shock]], [[sepsis]] | *Late: peritonitis, [[shock]], [[sepsis]] | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== | ||
*Classic triad not always present — | *Classic triad not always present — maintain high index of suspicion | ||
*Labs are nonspecific; obtain if concerned for complications: | *Labs are nonspecific; obtain if concerned for complications: | ||
**CBC, BMP, lactate (if concern for bowel ischemia) | **CBC, BMP, lactate (if concern for bowel ischemia) | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
[[File:Ultrasound intussusception.jpg|thumb|Ultrasound showing characteristic target sign for intussusception.]] | [[File:Ultrasound intussusception.jpg|thumb|Ultrasound showing characteristic target sign for intussusception.]] | ||
[[File:Intussusception long and short axis.jpg|thumb|Intussusception in both short axis and longitudinal view<ref>http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/</ref>]] | [[File:Intussusception long and short axis.jpg|thumb|Intussusception in both short axis and longitudinal view<ref>http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/</ref>]] | ||
*Sensitivity and specificity approach | *Sensitivity and specificity approach 100% (operator dependent) | ||
* | *Target/doughnut sign (short axis): concentric rings of bowel wall | ||
* | *Pseudokidney sign (long axis): layered appearance | ||
*Can identify | *Can identify ileo-ileal intussusception (contrast enema cannot) | ||
*Successfully implemented as | *Successfully implemented as bedside POCUS in many EDs | ||
**Technique: linear probe, graded compression over all 4 abdominal quadrants | **Technique: linear probe, graded compression over all 4 abdominal quadrants | ||
*Negative US does not completely exclude intermittent intussusception | *Negative US does not completely exclude intermittent intussusception | ||
====Other Imaging==== | ====Other Imaging==== | ||
* | *Air-contrast enema: both diagnostic and therapeutic (see Management) | ||
* | *CT abdomen: preferred in adults<ref>Marinis A et al. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: A review. ''World J Gastroenterol''. 2009;15(4):407-411. PMID 19152443</ref> | ||
**Target sign, sausage-shaped mass, lead point identification | **Target sign, sausage-shaped mass, lead point identification | ||
**Up to 20% of adult cases lack identifiable lead point | **Up to 20% of adult cases lack identifiable lead point | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
==Management== | ==Management== | ||
===Pediatric=== | ===Pediatric=== | ||
* | *NPO and IV access | ||
* | *IV fluid resuscitation prior to reduction | ||
*NG tube if bilious vomiting or significant distension | *NG tube if bilious vomiting or significant distension | ||
* | *Surgery consult prior to attempted reduction | ||
====Nonoperative Reduction (First-line for Stable Patients)==== | ====Nonoperative Reduction (First-line for Stable Patients)==== | ||
*Indicated if no evidence of | *Indicated if no evidence of perforation, peritonitis, or hemodynamic instability | ||
* | *Air-contrast enema (preferred at most centers): | ||
**Success rate: | **Success rate: 80-95% | ||
**Performed by radiology with surgery on standby | **Performed by radiology with surgery on standby | ||
**Contraindicated if perforation, peritonitis, or shock | **Contraindicated if perforation, peritonitis, or shock | ||
*'''Hydrostatic enema''' (saline or water-soluble contrast): alternative method | *'''Hydrostatic enema''' (saline or water-soluble contrast): alternative method | ||
*Rule of 3s: maximum | *Rule of 3s: maximum 3 attempts of reduction, each lasting 3 minutes, with 3 minutes rest between | ||
====Surgical==== | ====Surgical==== | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
====Special Situations==== | ====Special Situations==== | ||
* | *Ileo-ileal intussusception (small bowel only, often incidental): | ||
**If stable, asymptomatic, and length <2.3 cm → expectant management reasonable (many resolve spontaneously) | **If stable, asymptomatic, and length <2.3 cm → expectant management reasonable (many resolve spontaneously) | ||
* | *Post-reduction observation: monitor for recurrence and complications for minimum 12-24 hours | ||
===Adults=== | ===Adults=== | ||
* | *Surgical management is standard due to high incidence of malignancy | ||
*CT for preoperative planning and lead point identification | *CT for preoperative planning and lead point identification | ||
==Disposition== | ==Disposition== | ||
* | *Admit after successful reduction for observation (minimum 12-24 hours) | ||
*Consider discharge only if: | *Consider discharge only if: | ||
**Successful reduction confirmed | **Successful reduction confirmed | ||
| Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
**Reliable parents with understanding of recurrence signs | **Reliable parents with understanding of recurrence signs | ||
**Reasonable distance to hospital | **Reasonable distance to hospital | ||
* | *Recurrence rate: 5-12%<ref>Gray MP, et al. Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis. ''Pediatrics''. 2014;134(1):110-9. PMID 24935999</ref><ref>Beres AL, et al. Comparative outcome analysis of the management of pediatric intussusception with or without surgical admission. ''J Pediatr Surg''. 2014;49(5):750-2. PMID 24851761</ref> | ||
**Majority of recurrences do NOT occur within first 24-48 hours | **Majority of recurrences do NOT occur within first 24-48 hours | ||
Latest revision as of 09:29, 22 March 2026
Background
- Most common cause of intestinal obstruction in 6 months to 6 years
- Peak incidence at 6-36 months
- Telescoping of proximal bowel segment (intussusceptum) into distal segment (intussuscipiens)
- Ileocolic type is most common in children
- Mesenteric involvement leads to venous congestion → ischemia → bloody/mucous stool
Pediatrics
- Typically no pathologic lead point (idiopathic in ~90% of cases <3 years)
- If > 6 years old, more likely to have a lead point:
- Meckel diverticulum, duplication cyst, polyp, lymphoma, Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP) hematoma, Peyer patch hypertrophy
- Often preceded by viral URI or gastroenteritis (lymphoid hyperplasia)
- Slight male predominance (3:2)
- Rotavirus vaccine associated with slightly increased risk in first week after dose
Adults
- Rare; accounts for 1-5% of bowel obstruction in adults
- 80% involve small bowel
- 70% associated with pathologic lead point (malignancy in up to 50% of colonic cases)
Clinical Features
Pediatrics
- Intermittent, colicky abdominal pain with episodes every 15-20 minutes
- Child draws knees to chest during episodes
- Asymptomatic intervals between episodes (child may appear well and playful)
- Vomiting (initially non-bilious; bilious in late stages)
- Lethargy may be sole presentation ("neurologic intussusception")
- May present with isolated seizure and abdominal pain[1]
- Classic triad present in only ~21% of cases[2]:
- Sudden colicky abdominal pain
- Palpable sausage-shaped mass (right upper quadrant/epigastric)
- Currant jelly stool (only ~50%; late finding indicating mucosal ischemia)
- Dance sign: emptiness in RLQ (cecum displaced superiorly)
- Late: peritonitis, shock, sepsis
Adults
- Typically partial/small bowel obstruction symptoms
- Vomiting, abdominal distension, constipation, rectal bleeding
- Late: sepsis, perforation
Differential Diagnosis
Pediatric Abdominal Pain
0–3 Months Old
- Emergent
- Nonemergent
3 mo–3 y old
- Emergent
- Nonemergent
3 y old–adolescence
- Emergent
- Nonemergent
Evaluation
- Classic triad not always present — maintain high index of suspicion
- Labs are nonspecific; obtain if concerned for complications:
- CBC, BMP, lactate (if concern for bowel ischemia)
- Guaiac-positive stool (~50%)
Imaging
Ultrasound (Test of Choice in Pediatrics)
File:Ultrasound intussusception.jpg
Ultrasound showing characteristic target sign for intussusception.
File:Intussusception long and short axis.jpg
Intussusception in both short axis and longitudinal view[3]
- Sensitivity and specificity approach 100% (operator dependent)
- Target/doughnut sign (short axis): concentric rings of bowel wall
- Pseudokidney sign (long axis): layered appearance
- Can identify ileo-ileal intussusception (contrast enema cannot)
- Successfully implemented as bedside POCUS in many EDs
- Technique: linear probe, graded compression over all 4 abdominal quadrants
- Negative US does not completely exclude intermittent intussusception
Other Imaging
- Air-contrast enema: both diagnostic and therapeutic (see Management)
- CT abdomen: preferred in adults[4]
- Target sign, sausage-shaped mass, lead point identification
- Up to 20% of adult cases lack identifiable lead point
Management
Pediatric
- NPO and IV access
- IV fluid resuscitation prior to reduction
- NG tube if bilious vomiting or significant distension
- Surgery consult prior to attempted reduction
Nonoperative Reduction (First-line for Stable Patients)
- Indicated if no evidence of perforation, peritonitis, or hemodynamic instability
- Air-contrast enema (preferred at most centers):
- Success rate: 80-95%
- Performed by radiology with surgery on standby
- Contraindicated if perforation, peritonitis, or shock
- Hydrostatic enema (saline or water-soluble contrast): alternative method
- Rule of 3s: maximum 3 attempts of reduction, each lasting 3 minutes, with 3 minutes rest between
Surgical
- Indicated when:
- Nonoperative reduction incomplete or unsuccessful
- Patient is hemodynamically unstable, toxic, or has perforation/peritonitis
- Pathologic lead point identified
- Recurrent intussusception (relative indication)
Special Situations
- Ileo-ileal intussusception (small bowel only, often incidental):
- If stable, asymptomatic, and length <2.3 cm → expectant management reasonable (many resolve spontaneously)
- Post-reduction observation: monitor for recurrence and complications for minimum 12-24 hours
Adults
- Surgical management is standard due to high incidence of malignancy
- CT for preoperative planning and lead point identification
Disposition
- Admit after successful reduction for observation (minimum 12-24 hours)
- Consider discharge only if:
- Successful reduction confirmed
- Good follow-up available
- Reliable parents with understanding of recurrence signs
- Reasonable distance to hospital
- Recurrence rate: 5-12%[5][6]
- Majority of recurrences do NOT occur within first 24-48 hours
See Also
References
- ↑ Kleizen KJ et al. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(11):1822-4. PMID 19664012
- ↑ Bruce J, et al. Intussusception: evolution of current management. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1987;6:663-674. PMID 3430268
- ↑ http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/
- ↑ Marinis A et al. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: A review. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(4):407-411. PMID 19152443
- ↑ Gray MP, et al. Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2014;134(1):110-9. PMID 24935999
- ↑ Beres AL, et al. Comparative outcome analysis of the management of pediatric intussusception with or without surgical admission. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(5):750-2. PMID 24851761
- Waseem M, Rosenberg HK. Intussusception. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008;24(11):793-800. PMID 19018227
- Gluckman S, et al. Management for intussusception in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD006476. PMID 28617038
