Appendicitis (peds): Difference between revisions

Line 54: Line 54:


==Evaluation==
==Evaluation==
[[File:Appendicitis_Jarrett_Subramaniam.gif|thumbnail|Dilated, non-compressible appendix with appendicolith and surrounding free fluid<ref>http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/</ref>]]
[[File:AppendicitisMark.png|thumb|Peri-appendiceal fat stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]]
[[File:X-ray showing fecalith which has caused appendicitis.jpg|thumb|Fecalith (arrow) and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]]
[[File:CAT scan demonstrating acute appendicitis.jpg|thumb|Dialated appendix and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.]]
===Workup===
===Workup===



Revision as of 20:15, 14 February 2024

This page is for pediatric patients. For adult patients, see: appendicitis

Background

Drawing of colon with variability of appendix locations as seen from anterior view.
  • Most common between 9-12yr
  • Perforation rate 90% in children <4yr
  • NPV of 98% achieved if:
    • Lack of nausea (or emesis or anorexia)
    • Lack of maximal TTP in the RLQ
    • Lack of neutrophil count > 6750

Clinical Features

Location of McBurney's point (1), located two thirds the distance from the umbilicus (2) to the right anterior superior iliac spine (3).
  • Local tenderness + McBurney's point rigidity most reliable clinical sign

Neonates

Infants (30 days - 2 yrs)

Preschool (2 - 5yrs)

School-age (6 - 12yrs)

Adolescents (>12yrs)

  • Present similar to adults
    • RLQ pain
    • Vomiting (occurs after onset of abdominal pain)
    • Anorexia

Differential Diagnosis

Pediatric Abdominal Pain

0–3 Months Old

3 mo–3 y old

3 y old–adolescence

Evaluation

Dilated, non-compressible appendix with appendicolith and surrounding free fluid[1]
Peri-appendiceal fat stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.
Fecalith (arrow) and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.
Dialated appendix and stranding in the setting of acute appendicitis.

Workup

Diagnosis

Pediatric Appendicitis Score

Nausea/vomiting +1
Anorexia +1
Migration of pain to RLQ +1
Fever +1
Cough/percussion/hopping tenderness +2
RLQ tenderness +2
Leucocytosis (WBC > 10,000) +1
Neutrophilia (ANC > 7,500) +1
  • Score ≤ 2
    • Low risk (0-2.5%)
    • Consider discharge home with close follow up
  • Score 3-6
    • Indeterminate risk
    • Consider serial exams, consultation, or imaging
  • Score ≥ 7
    • High risk
    • Consider surgical consultation

Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC)

  • pARC score shown to outperform Pediatric Appendicitis Score. pARC score accurately assesses risk of appendicitis in children age 5 years and older in community EDs [2]

Laboratory Findings

  • WBC
    • <10K is a negative predictor of appendicitis
  • Urinalysis
    • 7-25% of patients with appendicitis have sterile pyuria

Imaging

Consider in intermediate or higher risk patients

  • Ultrasound
    • Sn: 88%, Sp: 94%
    • Consider as 1st choice in non-obese children
    • Indeterminate ultrasound and an Alvarado <5 has an NPV of 99.6%[3]
  • CT with contrast
    • Sn: 94%, Sp: 95%
    • Consider if ultrasound is equivocal OR strong suspicion despite normal ultrasound

Management

Disposition

  • Admission

See Also

References

  1. http://www.thepocusatlas.com/pediatrics/
  2. Cotton D, et al., Validation of the Pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator (pARC) in a Community Emergency Department Setting. Annals Emrg. Med. 2019; 74(4) 471-480
  3. Blitman, et al. Value of focused appendicitis ultrasound and Alverado score in predicting appendicitis in children: Can we reduce the use of CT? AJR. 2015; 204:W707-W712.
  4. Yardeni D et al. Single daily dosing ceftriaxone and metronidazole vs standard triple antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis in children: a prospective randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Jun; 43(6): 981–985.