Advanced airway adjuncts: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
**[[Laryngeal mask airway]]
**[[Laryngeal mask airway]]
*[[Pediatric jet ventilation]]
*[[Pediatric jet ventilation]]
{| {{table}}
{| {{table}}
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Airway Adjunct'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Airway Adjunct'''
Line 10: Line 9:
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Cons'''
| align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Cons'''
|-
|-
| Endotracheal tube introducer (ETI)/Gum Elastic Bougie||Higher first pass success when used with direct laryngscope vs. styletted ET tube regardless of whether difficult airway was expected or not<ref>Driver, B. E., Prekker, M. E., Klein, L. R., Reardon, R. F., Miner, J. R., Fagerstrom, E. T., … Cole, J. B. (2018). Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 319(21), 2179–2189.</ref>||
| Endotracheal tube introducer (ETI)/Gum Elastic Bougie||Higher first pass success when used with direct laryngscope vs. styletted ET tube regardless of whether difficult airway was expected or not [1]||
|-
|-
| Lighted Optical Stylets||
| Lighted Optical Stylets||*High success rate - especially good for trauma, c-spine precautions *Use for both reg and nasotrach *Lower complication rate||Limited by fogging, secretion, recognition of anatomy, cost, and rare provider experience
*High success rate - especially good for trauma, c-spine precautions
||
*Limited by fogging, secretion, recognition of anatomy, cost, and rare provider experience
|-
| ||Use for both reg and nasotrach||
|-
| ||Lower complication rate||
|-
|-
| Supraglottic airway||||
| Supraglottic airway||||
Line 25: Line 17:
| [[Laryngeal mask airway]]||||
| [[Laryngeal mask airway]]||||
|-
|-
| Combitube- esoph obturator||Good for nurses and paramedics with limited intubation skill||Large size predisposes to esophogeal dilatation and laceration as a complication
| Combitube- esoph obturator||*Good for nurses and paramedics with limited intubation skill *Indicated if difficult airway predicted: cannot see glottis with laryngoscope *Reduced risk for aspiration compared to face mask or LMA *Can maintain spinal immobilization||Large size predisposes to esophogeal dilatation and laceration as a complication
|-
| ||Indicated if difficult airway predicted: cannot see glottis with laryngoscope||
|-
| ||Reduced risk for aspiration compared to face mask or LMA||
|-
| ||Can maintain spinal immobilization||
|-
| Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation||Prefered over crithyrotomy in children up to age 10-12||Can retain CO2
|-
| ||Oxygenates well||May cause pneumothorax or barotrauma
|-
|-
| ||Can use for 30-45 min
| Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation||*Prefered over crithyrotomy in children up to age 10-12 *Oxygenates well *Can use for 30-45 min||*Can retain CO2 *May cause pneumothorax or barotrauma
|}
|}



Revision as of 12:26, 2 February 2019

Airway Adjunct Pros Cons
Endotracheal tube introducer (ETI)/Gum Elastic Bougie Higher first pass success when used with direct laryngscope vs. styletted ET tube regardless of whether difficult airway was expected or not [1]
Lighted Optical Stylets *High success rate - especially good for trauma, c-spine precautions *Use for both reg and nasotrach *Lower complication rate Limited by fogging, secretion, recognition of anatomy, cost, and rare provider experience
Supraglottic airway
Laryngeal mask airway
Combitube- esoph obturator *Good for nurses and paramedics with limited intubation skill *Indicated if difficult airway predicted: cannot see glottis with laryngoscope *Reduced risk for aspiration compared to face mask or LMA *Can maintain spinal immobilization Large size predisposes to esophogeal dilatation and laceration as a complication
Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation *Prefered over crithyrotomy in children up to age 10-12 *Oxygenates well *Can use for 30-45 min *Can retain CO2 *May cause pneumothorax or barotrauma

Endotracheal tube introducer (ETI)/Gum Elastic Bougie

  • Higher first pass success when used with direct laryngscope vs. styletted ET tube regardless of whether difficult airway was expected or not [1]
  • Blind orotracheal intubation

Lighted Optical Stylets

  • High success rate - especially good for trauma, c-spine precautions
  • Use for both reg and nasotrach
  • Lower complication rate
  • Limited by fogging, secretion, recognition of anatomy, cost, and rare provider experience

LMA

Combitube- esoph obturator

  • Good for nurses and paramedics with limited intubation skill
  • Indicated if difficult airway predicted: cannot see glottis with laryngoscope
  • Reduced risk for aspiration compared to face mask or LMA
  • Can maintain spinal immobilization
  • Large size predisposes to esophogeal dilatation and laceration as a complication

Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation

  • PTV
  • Prefered over crithyrotomy in children up to age 10-12
  • Needle, 16-18ga through cricoid membrane, connected to 50 psi 02[2]
    • Oxygenates well
    • Ventilate through glottis and upper airway - can retain CO2
  • Need adequate oxygen pressure
  • 1 sec insp and 2- 3 sec exp to avoid breath stacking
  • Can use for 30-45 min
  • May cause pneumothorax or barotrauma
  • Contraindications
    • Distorted anatomy
    • Bleeding diathesis
    • Complete airway obstruction

See Also

Airway Pages

  1. Driver, B. E., Prekker, M. E., Klein, L. R., Reardon, R. F., Miner, J. R., Fagerstrom, E. T., … Cole, J. B. (2018). Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 319(21), 2179–2189.
  2. Beck, E., Kharasch, M., Casey, J., Ochoa, P., Menon, S., Calabrese, N. and Wang, E. (2011) ‘Percutaneous Transtracheal jet ventilation’, Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(5), pp. e38–e38.