Mass casualty incident

Revision as of 08:36, 24 July 2015 by Mholtz (talk | contribs)

Background

  • Mass Casualty Incident (MCI) defined as an incident where the number of patients (or the rate of their arrival to a medical facility) overwhelms local resources (and the ability to immediately supplement them).[1][2]

Potential Causes of MCI

Mass casualty incident

Management

Initial Triage

  • In an MCI, triage differs slightly from normal Emergency Department triage.
    • Based not only on severity of injury/illness, but also on prognosis/survivability in the setting of limited resources[3]
  • START triage is the most common triage system utilized in the United States.
    • Several other triage systems exist, but all (including START) lack validation or strong evidence (likely impossible given nature of MCIs)[4][5]
  • Triage should be ongoing process, with patient statuses (and triage designations) updated as they change.

Incident Command System (ICS)

ICS Organization Structure
  • Ensure the scene is safe
  • Establish Incident Commander (IC)
  • Request additional appropriate resources
    • Additional ALS/BLS
    • Fire resources (HAZMAT, heavy rescue, ect.)
    • Medevac
      • Establish landing zone
  • Establish staging areas for resources
  • No more than 8 people per supervisor
    • 3-5 preferred

References

  1. Briggs SM. Disaster management teams. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Dec;11(6):585-9.
  2. Lee JS, Franc JM. Impact of a Two-step Emergency Department Triage Model with START, then CTAS, on Patient Flow During a Simulated Mass-casualty Incident. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Jun 24:1-7.
  3. Pesik N, Keim ME, Iserson KV. Terrorism and the ethics of emergency medical care. Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;37(6):642-6.
  4. Cross KP, Petry MJ, Cicero MX. A better START for low-acuity victims: data-driven refinement of mass casualty triage. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;19(2):272-8. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.942481.
  5. Kahn CA, Schultz CH, Miller KT, Anderson CL. Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;54(3):424-30, 430.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.035.