Difference between revisions of "Malignant bowel obstruction"
(→Clear Malignant Bowel Obstruction)
(Text replacement - "* " to "*")
|Line 22:||Line 22:|
* May be appropriate if stenting or surgery would be considered
*May be appropriate if stenting or surgery would be considered
* Will often distiguish between unifocal (which may be amenable to endoscopic stenting or surgery) versus multi-focal obstructions (which portends a poor prognosis)
*Will often distiguish between unifocal (which may be amenable to endoscopic stenting or surgery) versus multi-focal obstructions (which portends a poor prognosis)
== Management ==
== Management ==
Revision as of 21:12, 5 July 2016
Bowel obstruction in malignancy is complex in aetiology
Underlying pathophysiology often involves combination of physical mechanical obstruction plus ileus / motility related issues, usually in patients with disseminated peritoneal metastases
Pelvic malignancies, especially ovarian cancer
Gastrointestinal malignancies such as colorectal cancer or pancreas cancer
Often a preceding waxing and waning course of nausea and vomiting with reducing frequency of bowel movements and abdominal distension for a few weeks.
As the illness progresses an obvious mechanical bowel obstruction may develop. See Small bowel obstruction#Clinnical Features
The appropriate extent of investigations and treatment varies based on how advanced the patients malignancy is as well as his or her wishes.
- May be appropriate if stenting or surgery would be considered
- Will often distiguish between unifocal (which may be amenable to endoscopic stenting or surgery) versus multi-focal obstructions (which portends a poor prognosis)
In patients at high risk of a full blown malignant bowel obstruction who have no abdominal pain but increasing distension, nausea, vomiting and reducing bowel movements:
Metoclopramide 30mg via CSCI over 24 hours Sodium docusate 200mg twice daily (or an alternative stool softener) +/- Dexamethasone 8mg daily SC
Clear Malignant Bowel Obstruction
In many patients surgery or stenting is unlikely to be helpful, although for very proximal unifocal lesions or for patients otherwise very fit and healthy it may be worth considereding
Usually malignant bowel obstruction is indicative that a patient is coming into the last few weeks or month of life. A kind but frank discussion about this is usually helpful.
If vomiting and abdominal pain are very severe, consider drainage NG tube. If severe vomiting and discomfort are not major issues then it may be best to avoid an NG tube, especially if a more comfort-based approach to treatment is being considered
Treat vomiting and distension with anti-secretorary agents:
Ranitidine 150mg via CSCI over 24 hours Octreotide 600mg via CSCI over 24 hours
Treat nausea with an anti-emetic, e.g.
Haloperidol 2.5mg via CSCI over 24 hours + Haloperidol 1mg SC 2-hourly PRN for nausea
Treat abdominal pain with an anti-spasmodic + an opioid, e.g.
Hyoscine butylbromide 60mg via CSCI over 24 hours A low dose opioid via CSCI over 24 hours and SC PRN
Also consider dexamethasone 8mg daily SC
If intractable vomiting persists, consider a venting PEG.
In patients where comfort and quality of life are the key concerns, IV fluids may not be helpful unless thirst is an issue.
In patients where life-prolongation is very important, IV hydration and TPN in hospital or in the home setting may be appropriate.