EBQ:Omeprazole in Bleeding Peptic Ulcers: Difference between revisions
(outcomes) |
(major points) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Major Points== | ==Major Points== | ||
*Bleeding recurrence in 30 days was 6.7% (8 patients) in the omeprazole group, and 22.% (27 patients) in the placebo group | |||
*In vitro studies have shown that high intragastric pH could facilitate platelet aggregation, thus preventing bleeding.<ref> Green FW Jr, Kaplan MM, Curtis LE, Levine PH. Effect of acid and pepsin on blood coagulation and platelet aggregation: a possible contrivutor prolonged gastroduodenal mucosal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology 1978;74:38-43. <ref/> | |||
==Study Design== | ==Study Design== | ||
*Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study | *Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study | ||
*Patients underwent endoscopy within 24 hours after admission | *Patients underwent endoscopy within 24 hours after admission | ||
*Patients with actively bleeeding ulcers or ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels were treated with local epi injection followed by thermocoagulation | |||
*After hemostasis achieved, patients were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to receive omeprazole or placebo. (details in interventions) | |||
*After infusion, all patients were given 20 mg omeprazole PO daily for 8 weeks | |||
*Primary end point was recurrent bleeding within 30 days after endoscopy | |||
**Bleeding was considered to have recurred if any of the following occurred: vomiting of fresh blood, shock (SBP <90 mm Hg or HR >110) with melena after stabilization, or a drop of Hb >2 g/dL within 24 hours after a transfusion to 10 g/dL | |||
**Patients judged to have recurrent bleeding underwent urgent endoscopy | |||
*All patients reevaluated at eight weeks in outpatient clinic | |||
*All investigators remained unaware of the patients' treatment assignment until the study was completed | |||
==Population== | ==Population== | ||
Line 54: | Line 64: | ||
===Inclusion Criteria=== | ===Inclusion Criteria=== | ||
*Admitted to Prince of Wales Hospital from May 1998 to July 1999 with bleeding peptic ulcers | |||
*>16 years | *>16 years | ||
*Patients with successful endoscopic treatment of actively bleeding ulcers or ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels | *Patients with successful endoscopic treatment of actively bleeding ulcers or ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels | ||
===Exclusion Criteria=== | ===Exclusion Criteria=== | ||
*Unsuccessful endoscopic treatment | *Unsuccessful endoscopic treatment, requiring immediate surgery | ||
*Ulcers with clean bases or flat pigments on endoscopy, therefore not requiring endoscopic treatment | |||
*10 patients excluded due to terminal cancer | |||
*9 patients excluded as they were moribund from concomitant illnesses | |||
==Interventions== | ==Interventions== | ||
*After endoscopic treatment, patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or omeprazole, given as an 80-mg bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg per hour for a period of 72 hours. | *After endoscopic treatment, patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or omeprazole, given as an 80-mg bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg per hour for a period of 72 hours. | ||
**Identical-appearing vials of omeprazole and placebo were prepared with random numbers in blocks of 80 | **Identical-appearing vials of omeprazole and placebo were prepared by pharmacy with random numbers in blocks of 80 | ||
**Treatment was started in the recovery area of the endoscopy suite and continued in a surgical ward | **Eligible patients were given the lowest-numbered treatment package | ||
**Treatment was started in the recovery area of the endoscopy suite and continued in a surgical ward | |||
==Outcomes== | ==Outcomes== | ||
n=240, 120 patients in each group | |||
*End point data analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle | |||
===Primary Outcome=== | ===Primary Outcome=== | ||
Line 74: | Line 88: | ||
*Hazard ratio: 3.9 (95% CI 1.7-9.0) | *Hazard ratio: 3.9 (95% CI 1.7-9.0) | ||
*Recurrent bleeding most common in first 3 days: 4.2% in omeprazole vs. 20% in placebo | *Recurrent bleeding most common in first 3 days: 4.2% in omeprazole vs. 20% in placebo | ||
===Secondary Outcomes=== | ===Secondary Outcomes=== | ||
*Mean number of units transfused after endoscopy was significant smaller in omepraole group (1.7 vs. 2.4 units, P=0.03) | |||
**Mean number of units transfused before treatment was similar in the groups (1.0 vs. 1.1, P=0.46) | |||
*Significantly more patients in the omeprazole group had a hospital stay <5 days (46.7% vs. 31.7%, P=0.02) | |||
*No significant difference in patients who underwent surgery (2.5% in omeprazole group vs. 7.5% in placebo group, P=0.14) | |||
*No significant difference in patients who died within 30 days after endoscopy (4.2% in omeprazole group vs. 10% in placebo group, P=0.13) | |||
Line 83: | Line 102: | ||
==Criticisms & Further Discussion== | ==Criticisms & Further Discussion== | ||
*Study intended to recruit 320 patients and to conduct four interim analysis. However, the trial was terminated after the third planned interim analysis with 240 patients because a significant different (P<0.001) between the groups. | |||
==Funding== | ==Funding== | ||
Supported in full by a grant from the Research Grants council of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== |
Revision as of 20:09, 8 September 2015
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Does high dose intravenous omeprazole reduce the incidence of recurrent bleeding in patients who have undergone endoscopic intervention for bleeding peptic ulcers?
Conclusion
High-dose infusion of omeprazole after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers substantially reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding.
Major Points
- Bleeding recurrence in 30 days was 6.7% (8 patients) in the omeprazole group, and 22.% (27 patients) in the placebo group
- In vitro studies have shown that high intragastric pH could facilitate platelet aggregation, thus preventing bleeding.<ref> Green FW Jr, Kaplan MM, Curtis LE, Levine PH. Effect of acid and pepsin on blood coagulation and platelet aggregation: a possible contrivutor prolonged gastroduodenal mucosal hemorrhage. Gastroenterology 1978;74:38-43. Cite error: The opening
<ref>
tag is malformed or has a bad name
Study Design
- Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
- Patients underwent endoscopy within 24 hours after admission
- Patients with actively bleeeding ulcers or ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels were treated with local epi injection followed by thermocoagulation
- After hemostasis achieved, patients were randomly assigned in double-blind fashion to receive omeprazole or placebo. (details in interventions)
- After infusion, all patients were given 20 mg omeprazole PO daily for 8 weeks
- Primary end point was recurrent bleeding within 30 days after endoscopy
- Bleeding was considered to have recurred if any of the following occurred: vomiting of fresh blood, shock (SBP <90 mm Hg or HR >110) with melena after stabilization, or a drop of Hb >2 g/dL within 24 hours after a transfusion to 10 g/dL
- Patients judged to have recurrent bleeding underwent urgent endoscopy
- All patients reevaluated at eight weeks in outpatient clinic
- All investigators remained unaware of the patients' treatment assignment until the study was completed
Population
Patient Demographics
Omeprazole vs. Placebo
Male: 66.7% vs. 66.7%
Age: 64 vs. 67
Hemoglobin (g/dL): 9.4 vs. 9.5
Location of ulcer:
- Stomach: 44% vs. 40%
- Duodenum: 54% vs. 54%
- Stoma: 2% vs. 6%
Endoscopic signs of bleeding:
- Spurting hemorrhage: 12% vs. 8%
- Oozing hemorrhage: 42% vs. 41%
- Nonbleeding visible vessel: 32% vs. 30%
- Clot with underlying vessel: 15% vs. 22%
Size of ulcer (cm): 1.2 vs. 1.1
Previous ulcer disease: 32% vs. 38%
Previous ulcer bleeding: 30% vs. 30%
Recent use of H2 antagonist or PPI: 2% vs. 2%
Risk factor of bleeding peptic ulcer:
- H.pylori infection: 65% vs. 53%
- Use of NSAIDs: 33% vs. 33%
- Use of aspirin: 19% vs. 15%
- Use of warfarin: 4% vs. 4%
Development of bleeding during hospitalization: 18% vs. 19%
Pts with coexisting illnesses: 25% vs. 30%
Inclusion Criteria
- Admitted to Prince of Wales Hospital from May 1998 to July 1999 with bleeding peptic ulcers
- >16 years
- Patients with successful endoscopic treatment of actively bleeding ulcers or ulcers with nonbleeding visible vessels
Exclusion Criteria
- Unsuccessful endoscopic treatment, requiring immediate surgery
- Ulcers with clean bases or flat pigments on endoscopy, therefore not requiring endoscopic treatment
- 10 patients excluded due to terminal cancer
- 9 patients excluded as they were moribund from concomitant illnesses
Interventions
- After endoscopic treatment, patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of placebo or omeprazole, given as an 80-mg bolus injection followed by a continuous infusion of 8 mg per hour for a period of 72 hours.
- Identical-appearing vials of omeprazole and placebo were prepared by pharmacy with random numbers in blocks of 80
- Eligible patients were given the lowest-numbered treatment package
- Treatment was started in the recovery area of the endoscopy suite and continued in a surgical ward
Outcomes
n=240, 120 patients in each group
- End point data analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle
Primary Outcome
- Bleeding recurred within 30 days after treatment in 8 patients (6.7%) in omeprazole group, as compared with 27 (22.5%) in the placebo group.
- Hazard ratio: 3.9 (95% CI 1.7-9.0)
- Recurrent bleeding most common in first 3 days: 4.2% in omeprazole vs. 20% in placebo
Secondary Outcomes
- Mean number of units transfused after endoscopy was significant smaller in omepraole group (1.7 vs. 2.4 units, P=0.03)
- Mean number of units transfused before treatment was similar in the groups (1.0 vs. 1.1, P=0.46)
- Significantly more patients in the omeprazole group had a hospital stay <5 days (46.7% vs. 31.7%, P=0.02)
- No significant difference in patients who underwent surgery (2.5% in omeprazole group vs. 7.5% in placebo group, P=0.14)
- No significant difference in patients who died within 30 days after endoscopy (4.2% in omeprazole group vs. 10% in placebo group, P=0.13)
Subgroup analysis
Criticisms & Further Discussion
- Study intended to recruit 320 patients and to conduct four interim analysis. However, the trial was terminated after the third planned interim analysis with 240 patients because a significant different (P<0.001) between the groups.
Funding
Supported in full by a grant from the Research Grants council of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region