EBQ:Japanese OHCA Prehospital Airway Management Trial
incomplete Journal Club Article
Hasegawa, K et al. "Association of Prehospital Advanced Airway Management With Neurologic Outcome and Survival in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest". JAMA. 2012. 309 (3)(187612):257–266.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
- Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation?
- Authors hypothesized that both supraglottic and endotracheal intubation would be associated with more favorable neurologic outcomes.
Conclusion
- Advanced airway of any type was independently associated with decreased odds of neurologically favorable survival compared to BVM ventilation
Major Points
- Advanced airway management during OHCA and CPR was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of favorable neurological outcome when compared to BVM management
- This negative association cannot prove causality
- Regression models using Propensity matched patients favored BVM when compared to both endotracheal intubation and supraglottic airway management in terms of obtaining ROSC prior to arrival at the hospital, 1-month survival, and neurologically favorable survival
Inclusion Criteria
- January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010
- Japanese EMS database
- 18 years older who had out of hospital cardiac arrest
- Resuscitation was attempted by EMS and patient was transported to hospital
Exclusion Criteria
- No age recorded for cardiac arrest
- Out of hospital airway management not documented
Interventions
- Advanced airway devices placed by EMTs
- Providers had 2 attempts to place airway device
- Advanced airway confirmed with end-tidal CO2 and/or esophageal detection device
Outcome
Primary Outcomes
- Favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest
- Favorable neurological outcome considered a Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance category of 1 or 2
- Overall: 2.2%
- BVM: 2.9%
- Advanced Airway: 1.1%
- Endotracheal Intubation: 1.0%
- Supraglottic Airway: 1.1%
- Odds Ratio (95% CI) Advanced Airway vs. BVM: 0.38 (0.36-0.39)
- Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories:
- Category 1 (good performance)
- Category 2 (moderate disability)
- Category 3 (severe disability)
- Category 4 (vegetative state)
- Category 5 (death)
Secondary Outcomes
- Return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrival
- Overall: 6.5%
- BVM: 7.0%
- Advanced Airway: 5.8%
- Endotracheal Intubation: 8.4%
- Supraglottic Airway: 5.3%
- Odds ratio (95% CI) Advanced Airway vs BVM: 0.81 (0.79-0.83)
- One-month survival
- Overall 4.7%
- BVM: 5.3%
- Advanced Airway: 3.9%
- Endotracheal Intubation: 4.2%
- Supraglottic Airway: 3.8%
- Odds ratio (95% CI) Advanced Airway vs BVM: 0.72 (0.70-0.73)
Subgroup analysis
- Advanced airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
- Endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
Criticisms
- Not a randomized and there is potential selection bias and confounding
- Generalization difficult for U.S. based EMS given different training for EMT's, different population, and different protocols
- Details regarding the process of information were not available
- It is possible that patients who received BVM only had ROSC sooner and therefore did not require advanced airway management
- It can be theorized that this subset of patients would have better neurological outcomes
Funding
- Grant support to Dr. Hiraide for emergency management scientific research from the Fire and Disaster Management Agency.
- The Fire and Disaster Management Agency gathered and managed the data but had no role in the design and conduct of the study; analysis and interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
References
- ↑ Ambulance Service Planning Office of Fire and Disaster Management Agency of Japan. Airway Management With Endotracheal Intubation by Emergency Life Saving Technicians. 2004. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2009/03/dl/s0325-12g_0001.pdf.