EBQ:Japanese OHCA Prehospital Airway Management Trial: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


==Clinical Question==
==Clinical Question==
*Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation?
*Both supraglottic and endotracheal intubation will be associated with more favorable neurologic outcomes.


==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==


==Major Points==  
==Major Points==  


==Inclusion Criteria==  
==Inclusion Criteria==  
*January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010
*Japanese EMS database
*18 years older who had out of hospital cardiac arrest
*Resuscitation was attempted by EMS and patient was transported to hospital
 


==Exclusion Criteria==
==Exclusion Criteria==
*no age recorded for cardiac arrest
*out of hospital airway records were not documented


==Interventions==  
==Interventions==  
*advanced airway devices placed with either endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway
*providers had 2 attempts to place airway
*advanced airway confirmed with end-tidal CO2 and/or esophageal detection device




Line 38: Line 44:


===Primary Outcomes===
===Primary Outcomes===
*favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest
*used Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance
**Category 1 (good performance)
**Category 2 (moderate disability)
**Category 3 (severe disability)
**Category 4 (vegetative state)
**Category 5 (death)


===Secondary Outcomes===  
===Secondary Outcomes===  
*Return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrive
*1 month survival


===Subgroup analysis===
===Subgroup analysis===
*Advanced airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
*Endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation


==Criticisms==
==Criticisms==
*Not a randomized and there is potential selection bias and confounding
 


==Funding==
==Funding==
   
   


==Sources==
==References==
 
 
<references/>
<references/>


[[Category:EBQ]]
[[Category:EBQ]]

Revision as of 21:06, 6 July 2017

incomplete Journal Club Article
Hasegawa, K et al. "Association of Prehospital Advanced Airway Management With Neurologic Outcome and Survival in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest". JAMA. 2012. 309 (3)(187612):257–266.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

  • Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation?
  • Both supraglottic and endotracheal intubation will be associated with more favorable neurologic outcomes.

Conclusion

Major Points

Inclusion Criteria

  • January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010
  • Japanese EMS database
  • 18 years older who had out of hospital cardiac arrest
  • Resuscitation was attempted by EMS and patient was transported to hospital


Exclusion Criteria

  • no age recorded for cardiac arrest
  • out of hospital airway records were not documented

Interventions

  • advanced airway devices placed with either endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway
  • providers had 2 attempts to place airway
  • advanced airway confirmed with end-tidal CO2 and/or esophageal detection device


Outcome

Primary Outcomes

  • favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest
  • used Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance
    • Category 1 (good performance)
    • Category 2 (moderate disability)
    • Category 3 (severe disability)
    • Category 4 (vegetative state)
    • Category 5 (death)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrive
  • 1 month survival

Subgroup analysis

  • Advanced airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
  • Endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation

Criticisms

  • Not a randomized and there is potential selection bias and confounding

Funding

References