EBQ:Canadian C-spine Rule Study

Revision as of 05:41, 11 January 2014 by Ostermayer (talk | contribs)
incomplete Journal Club Article
Stiell, Ian et al. "The Canadian C-spine Rule for Radiography in Alert and Stable Trauma Patients". JAMA. 2001. 286(15):1841-1848.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Can a clinical decision rule be used to evaluate the cervical spine in alert and stable trauma patients

Conclusion

THe Canadian C-spine rule is a highly sensitive decision rule for evaluate of clinically significant cervical spine injuries in trauma patients

Major Points

Study Design

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Interventions

Outcome

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

Funding

CME

Neuro/trauma question: The following patients are brought in to the ED with C-Collars in place. Which patient/patients, if any, could have their cervical spines cleared clinically and removed from immobilization? (more than one answer

9 year old female with unwitnessed fall from bed on to carpeted floor with no loss of consciousness or neck pain, ambulating on scene upon paramedic arrival and only complains of an abrasion to his elbow and tingling/pins and needles sensation in her hand
47 year old male who was assaulted with loss of consciousness, now 4-6-5, with no other injury/deficits.
18 year old male who is A+O x3 with facial abrasions but with no neurological deficits, loss of consciousness or neck pain brought in after an MVA in which his main injury is an open femur fracture
27 your old female found down outside of a bar GCS 4-6-4 initially upon paramedic arrival now 4-6-5 with positive ETOH on breath, who admits to having just a couple of beers earlier in the evening
95 year old woman who sustained a mechanical fall in bathtub. No midline neck pain, denies A+O x3, no other complaints/injuries, normal neuro exam. Only complaint is a 2cm laceration to her eyebrow.


Sources