EBQ:Irrigation of Cutaneous Abscesses Does Not Improve Treatment Success

Revision as of 15:55, 25 March 2016 by MMarschall (talk | contribs)
incomplete Journal Club Article
Chinook B, Henley G. "Irrigation of Cutaneous Abscesses Does Not Improve Treatment Success". Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016. 67(3):379-383.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Does irrigation of cutaneous abscesses in the ED reduce the need for further intervention?

Conclusion

Irrigation of cutaneous abscesses after standard incision and drainage does not decrease the need for further intervention, and may be unnecessary.

Major Points

Study Design

Prospective, randomized, non blinded, single center trial comparing irrigation with no irrigation. The study was conducted in an academic ED with an annual census of ~110,00 patients.

Population

Patient and Abscess Baseline Characteristics

Patient Characteristics Irrigation (95) No Irrigation (92)
Median Age 35 40
Cellulitis 61% 51%
Diabetes 17% 16%
Fever 3% 2%
Immunocompromised 3% 2%
Abscess Size Irrigation No Irrigation
Median 4.6 cm Irrigation 4.3 cm No Irrigation
Range 3-10 cm Irrigation 1-11 cm No Irrigation
Abscess Location Irrigation No Irrigation
Face, Scalp 5% 9%
Neck 3% 5%
Chest, Breast, Back, Abdomen, Inguinal 13% 22%
Buttocks 20% 16%
Perineum, Perianal, Labial, Scrotal 7% 4%
Leg, foot 19% 21%
Post Procedure Irrigation No Irrigation
Abscess Packed 89% 75%
IV ABX in ED 3% 8%
PO ABX in ED 42% 43%
ABX Rx’d 91% 73%

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients over the age of 18 with a cutaneous abscess

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • In police custody or prison resident
  • Patients admitted to the hospital
  • Operating room I&D
  • Inability to follow up in 48 hours, or to provide contact information for 30 day follow up

Interventions

The intervention was to perform irrigation or no irrigation during the I&D procedure in the ED. Out of the 209 patients randomized, 105 were assigned to the irrigation group and 104 to the no irrigation group.

For the irrigation group, the type of solution and amount used was at the providers discretion. The most commonly used irrigant was a 100 mL NSS in a squeeze bottle with a small caliber tip that can fit in an abscess pocket.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

  • Need for further intervention during subsequent 30 days

Secondary Outcomes

  • Visual analog pain score post procedure

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

External Links

See Also

Funding

No funding was reported for this study.

References