EBQ:Irrigation of Cutaneous Abscesses Does Not Improve Treatment Success

Revision as of 15:39, 25 March 2016 by MMarschall (talk | contribs)
incomplete Journal Club Article
Chinook B, Henley G. "Irrigation of Cutaneous Abscesses Does Not Improve Treatment Success". Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016. 67(3):379-383.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Does irrigation of cutaneous abscesses in the ED reduce the need for further intervention?

Conclusion

Irrigation of cutaneous abscesses after standard incision and drainage does not decrease the need for further intervention, and may be unnecessary.

Major Points

Study Design

Prospective, randomized, non blinded, single center trial comparing irrigation with no irrigation. The study was conducted in an academic ED with an annual census of ~110,00 patients.

Population

Patient and Abscess Baseline Characteristics

Patient Characteristics Irrigation (95) No Irrigation (92)
Median Age 35 40
Cellulitis 61% 51%
Diabetes 17% 16%
Fever 3% 2%
Immunocompromised 3% 2%
Abscess Size Irrigation No Irrigation
Median 4.6 cm Irrigation 4.3 cm No Irrigation
Range 3-10 cm Irrigation 1-11 cm No Irrigation
Abscess Location Irrigation No Irrigation
Face, Scalp 5% 9%
Neck 3% 5%
Chest, Breast, Back, Abdomen, Inguinal 13% 22%
Buttocks 20% 16%
Perineum, Perianal, Labial, Scrotal 7% 4%
Leg, foot 19% 21%
Post Procedure Irrigation No Irrigation
Abscess Packed 89% 75%
IV ABX in ED 3% 8%
PO ABX in ED 42% 43%
ABX Rx’d 91% 73%

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients over the age of 18 with a cutaneous abscess

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy
  • In police custody or prison resident
  • Patients admitted to the hospital
  • Operating room I&D
  • Inability to follow up in 48 hours, or to provide contact information for 30 day follow up

Interventions

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

External Links

See Also

Funding

References