Ottawa ankle rules: Difference between revisions
Line 30: Line 30:
==Source==
==Source==
<references/>
<references/>
 
*Blackham JEJ, Claridge T, Benger JR (2008). "Can patients apply the Ottawa ankle rules to themselves?". Emergency Medicine J 25 (11): 750–751
[[Category:Ortho]]
[[Category:Ortho]]

Revision as of 22:25, 23 April 2014

Ankle[1][2]

  • X-ray is only required if there is pain in the malleolar zone AND any of these findings:
  1. Bony tenderness along the posterior edge or distal 6cm of either malleolus
  2. Inability to bear weight for at least two steps with each foot immediately after the injury AND at the time of evaluation

Foot

  • X-ray is only required if there is pain in midfoot zone AND any of these findings:
  1. Bony tenderness over the navicular bone
  2. Bony tenderness over base of the 5th metatarsal
  3. Inability to bear weight for at least two steps with each foot immediately after the injury AND at the time of evaluation

Exceptions

  1. ?age <18 or >55
    1. Study of 1500 patients age 1-15 showed a sensitivity of 98%^
  2. Only for blunt trauma mechanism
  3. Does not apply to subacute/chronic injuries
  4. Does not apply to injuries of the hindfoot or forefoot

Imaging

Ottawa.jpg

See Also

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18955612

Source

  1. ↑ Bauer SJ et al. A clinical decision rule in the evaluation of acute knee injuries.J Emerg Med. 1995 Sep-Oct;13(5):611-5.
  2. ↑ Stiell IG, Greenberg GH, Wells GA, et al. (February 1996). "Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries". JAMA 275 (8)
  • Blackham JEJ, Claridge T, Benger JR (2008). "Can patients apply the Ottawa ankle rules to themselves?". Emergency Medicine J 25 (11): 750–751
Retrieved from "https://www.wikem.org/w/index.php?title=Ottawa_ankle_rules&oldid=20183"