EBQ:Japanese OHCA Prehospital Airway Management Trial: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
===Primary Outcomes=== | ===Primary Outcomes=== | ||
*favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest | |||
*favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest | |||
*used Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance | |||
**Category 1 (good performance) | |||
**Category 2 (moderate disability) | |||
**Category 3 (severe disability) | |||
**Category 4 (vegetative state) | |||
**Category 5 (death) | |||
===Secondary Outcomes=== | ===Secondary Outcomes=== | ||
*Return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrive | |||
*1 month survival | |||
===Subgroup analysis=== | ===Subgroup analysis=== | ||
*advanced airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation | |||
*endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation | |||
==Criticisms== | ==Criticisms== | ||
*not a randomized and there is potential selection bias and confounding | |||
==Funding== | ==Funding== | ||
Revision as of 12:47, 6 July 2017
incomplete Journal Club Article
Hasegawa, K et al. "Association of Prehospital Advanced Airway Management With Neurologic Outcome and Survival in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest". JAMA. 2012. 309 (3)(187612):257–266.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation?
Both supraglottic and endotracheal intubation will be associated with more favorable neurologic outcomes.
Conclusion
Major Points
Inclusion Criteria
- January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010
- Japanese EMS database
- 18 years older who had out of hospital cardiac arrest
- Resuscitation was attempted by EMS and patient was transported to hospital
Exclusion Criteria
- no age recorded for cardiac arrest
- out of hospital airway records were not documented
Interventions
- advanced airway devices placed with either endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway
- providers had 2 attempts to place airway
- advanced airway confirmed with end-tidal CO2 and/or esophageal detection device
Outcome
Primary Outcomes
- favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest
- used Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance
- Category 1 (good performance)
- Category 2 (moderate disability)
- Category 3 (severe disability)
- Category 4 (vegetative state)
- Category 5 (death)
Secondary Outcomes
- Return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrive
- 1 month survival
Subgroup analysis
- advanced airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
- endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
Criticisms
- not a randomized and there is potential selection bias and confounding
