EBQ:Ottawa Ankle Rule Study: Difference between revisions

(major points)
(exclusion criteria)
Line 55: Line 55:


===Exclusion Criteria===
===Exclusion Criteria===
*Age <18 years old
*Pregnant
*Isolated injuries of the skin
*Referred from outside hospital with radiographs
*Injury occurred >10 days previously
*Returned for reassessment of the same injury


==Interventions==  
==Interventions==  

Revision as of 02:45, 1 September 2015

incomplete Journal Club Article
Stiell I. et al.. "Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.". JAMA. 1993. 269(9):1127-32.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Can a clinical decision rule be used to aid in the efficient use of radiography in acute ankle injuries?

Conclusion

The Ottawa Ankle Rule is a highly sensitive decision rule used to determine the need for radiography in patients with acute ankle injuries.

Major Points

Ankle Rules

Anklexray.jpg

Ankle x-ray needed if pain near the maleoli AND

Inability to bear weight immediately and in the ED (4 steps)
OR
Tenderness at posterior edge or tip of lateral malleolus
OR
Tenderness at posterior edge or tip of medial malleolus


Rule had 100% sensitivity and 49% specificity for identifying 50 clinically significant malleolar zone fractures in the prospective validation study.


Foot Rules

Footxrays.jpg

Foot x-ray series needed if pain in the midfoot AND

Inability to bear weight both immediately and in the ED (4 steps)
OR
Tenderness at the navicular
OR
Tenderness at the base of the 5th metatarsal


Rule had 100% sensitivity and and 79% specificity for identifying 19 clinically significant midfoot fractures in the prospective validation study.

Study Design

Population

Patient Demographics

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age <18 years old
  • Pregnant
  • Isolated injuries of the skin
  • Referred from outside hospital with radiographs
  • Injury occurred >10 days previously
  • Returned for reassessment of the same injury

Interventions

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

Funding

Sources