Capacity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Text replacement - "AMS" to "altered mental status") |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#Criterion 1 - communicate a choice | #Criterion 1 - communicate a choice | ||
#*Clearly demonstrate preference for a treatment option | #*Clearly demonstrate preference for a treatment option | ||
#*Reversals of choice due to | #*Reversals of choice due to altered mental status or psychiatric disease suggests lack of capacity | ||
#Criterion 2 - understand relevant information | #Criterion 2 - understand relevant information | ||
#*Grasp fundamental understanding of information communicated by physician | #*Grasp fundamental understanding of information communicated by physician | ||
Revision as of 14:23, 31 July 2016
Background
- Capacity is the ability to understand the nature and effect of one’s acts
- May have capacity in one moment and lack capacity in another
- Does the patient have the ability to understand the nature and effect of his or her acts in a specific moment in time?
- The level of capacity needed to enter into legal documents, such as a durable power of attorney, contract, or a will, differs based upon the type of transaction
- Use to consent to medical procedures
- Mini mental status exam (MMSE) <19 are correlated with lack of capacity
Application
- For medical consent, does the patient have the ability to:
- Communicate
- Understand the medical procedure
- Understand a description of the procedure, its risks, its benefits, and its alternatives?
- Voluntarily consent?
- Give consent because he or she is competent?
Four Components
- Must have all four criterion to achieve capacity[1]
- Criterion 1 - communicate a choice
- Clearly demonstrate preference for a treatment option
- Reversals of choice due to altered mental status or psychiatric disease suggests lack of capacity
- Criterion 2 - understand relevant information
- Grasp fundamental understanding of information communicated by physician
- Must understand condition, purpose of treatment, benefits/risks of treatment, and alternatives
- Criterion 3 - appreciate situation and its consequences
- Acknowledge medical condition (no denial, delusions)
- No acknowledgement termed "lack of insight"
- "What do you believe is wrong with your health now?"
- "Do you believe that you will need treatment to make your health better?"
- "What do you believe will happen if you are not treated?"
- "Why do you think doctors recommend this treatment?"
- Criterion 4 - reason about treatment options
- Demonstrate rational processing of relevant information communicated by physician
- "What makes treatment 1 better than treatment 2?"
- "How did you decide to accept or reject recommended treatments?"
- Demonstrate rational processing of relevant information communicated by physician
See Also
References
- ↑ Appelbaum PS. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1834-40
