EBQ:Conservative versus interventional treatment for spontaneous pneumothorax: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{JC info
| title=
| abbreviation=
| expansion=
| published=
| author=
| journal=
| year=
| volume=
| issue=
| pages=
| pmid=
| fulltexturl=
| pdfurl=
}}
==Clinical Question==
==Clinical Question==


==Pro Argument==
==Conclusion==


===Trial 1===
==Major Points==  


===Trial 2===
==Study Design==
==Population==
===Patient Demographics===
===Inclusion Criteria===


===Trial 3===
===Exclusion Criteria===


==Con Argument==
==Interventions==  
===Trial 1===
==Outcomes==


===Trial 2===
===Primary Outcome===


===Trial 3===
===Secondary Outcomes===  


===Subgroup analysis===


==Criticisms & Further Discussion==
==External Links==
==See Also==
==Funding==


==References==
==References==
*Simon G.A. et. al Conservative versus Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax N Engl J Med 2020; 382:405-415 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1910775
<references/>
<references/>


[[Category:EBQ]]
[[Category:EBQ]]

Revision as of 22:18, 10 February 2020

incomplete Journal Club Article
. "". '. . :.
PubMed

Clinical Question

Conclusion

Major Points

Study Design

Population

Patient Demographics

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Interventions

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

External Links

See Also

Funding

References