Talk:Pulmonary embolism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Ostermayer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
VQ doesn't seem to offer much of a fetal radiation benefit for pregnant women http://www.acr.org/~/media/186992e39e754270bb3abbf44a5a5801.pdf#page6 | |||
And there are just perfusion scans as options http://www.resus.com.au/blog/vq-or-ctpa-in-suspected-pe-in-pregnancy/ | And there are just perfusion scans as options http://www.resus.com.au/blog/vq-or-ctpa-in-suspected-pe-in-pregnancy/ | ||
---- | |||
This is an important (and separate) topic. Lets move it to it's own page: [[PE in Pregnancy]] | This is an important (and separate) topic. Lets move it to it's own page: [[PE in Pregnancy]] | ||
Revision as of 17:30, 7 May 2014
VQ doesn't seem to offer much of a fetal radiation benefit for pregnant women http://www.acr.org/~/media/186992e39e754270bb3abbf44a5a5801.pdf#page6
And there are just perfusion scans as options http://www.resus.com.au/blog/vq-or-ctpa-in-suspected-pe-in-pregnancy/
This is an important (and separate) topic. Lets move it to it's own page: PE in Pregnancy