EBQ:Comparison of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium for RSI: Difference between revisions

(study design)
(outcomes)
Line 82: Line 82:
*138 (26%) received rocuronium
*138 (26%) received rocuronium


Indications for
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
Line 107: Line 106:
|}
|}


*34 patients had recorded hyperkalemia (>5 mmol/L) before intubation
**Rocuronium given to 23 of these patients


Common sedative agents used:
Common sedative agents used:

Revision as of 21:23, 18 September 2015

Under Review Journal Club Article
Laurin EG, et al. "A Comparison of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium for Rapid-sequence Intubation of Emergency Department Patients". Academic Emergency Medicine. 2000. 7(12):1362-9.
PubMed PDF

Clinical Question

How do succinylcholine and rocuronium compare for use is rapid-sequence intubation in the emergency department?

Conclusion

Both succinylcholine and rocuronium produce fast and reliable paralysis for RSI in the ED.

Major Points

Outcome Succinylcholine Rocuronium p value
Measured time of onset (± SD) 39 ± 13 seconds 44 ± 20 seconds 0.04
Frequency of body movements 0-10 (± SD) 9.5 ± 1.1 9.1 ± 1.5 0.01
Vocal cord movements 0-10 (± SD) 9.2 ± 1.6 9.0 ± 1.6 0.15
Satisfaction 0-10 (± SD) 9.4 ± 1.3 8.8 ± 2.0 <0.01
Related complications 1: QRS widening in pt with hyperkalemia 0 --
Mean Dosage 1.7 mg/kg 1.0 mg/kg --
  • No patient desaturated and required assisted ventilations while waiting for paralysis to occur

Study Design

  • Prospective cohort study at the UC Davis Medical Center, a level 1 trauma center
  • Emergency physicians attended in-service about rocuronium before study, were given information on pharmacologic properties, indications for use, and dose for intubation (1.0 mg/kg used)
  • Agreed indications for rocuronium use:
    • Known or suspected hyperkalemia
    • No medical history available
    • Signs of increased intracranial pressure
    • Chronic neuromuscular disease
    • Crush injury
    • Non-acute burns
    • Globe injury
    • To avoid a second dose of succinylcholine
  • No paralytic agent was mandated, but succinylcholine continued to be first-choice agent.
  • Data form completed by intubator immediately after intubation:
    • Patient's name, age, gender
    • Paralytic used
    • Reason for use
    • Time from administration to paralysis
    • Serum K at time of intubation
    • Need for BVM ventilation
    • Pulse ox readings during intubation
    • Complications

Population

Patient Demographics

  • Mean age: 46 years old
    • Range: days old-96 years old
  • Male: 63%

Inclusion Criteria

  • Every patient intubated in the ED from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 was eligible for enrollment

Exclusion Criteria

Interventions

Prospective observational study of paralytic use in ED

Outcomes

N= 521 patients who received RSI in the ED

  • 382 (73%) received succinylcholine
  • 138 (26%) received rocuronium
Common Indications for Rocuronium Use Number of Patients (%)
Suspected hyperkalemia 53 (38%)
    Chronic renal failure 28
    Rhabdomyolysis 6
Lack of medical history 43 (31%)
Known hyperkalemia 11 (8%)
Neuromuscular disease 11 (8%)
  • 34 patients had recorded hyperkalemia (>5 mmol/L) before intubation
    • Rocuronium given to 23 of these patients

Common sedative agents used:

  • Etomidate: 464 patients (89%), mean dose 0.29 mg/kg
  • Midaolam: 12 patients(2%), mean dose 0.09 mg/kg
  • Obtunded--no sedative used: 15 patients (3%)
  • No sedation recorded: 14 patients (2%)

Criticisms & Further Discussion

  • Onset of paralysis was only directly measured in 33% patients, with the rest being estimated by the person intubating
    • Significant difference (p=0.04) was calculated only for the measured values, but no statistical significance was calculated for estimated values
    • Although statistical significance of onset time was established, clinical significance is unclear as there were no incidences of desaturation in either group
  • Physicians were allowed to hand-pick patients to include in the study without specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, introducing the possibility for selection bias.
  • Patients were not randomized, and physicians were not blinded to medication choice.
    • Satisfaction score, estimated time to paralysis may be biased

External Links

Funding

References