EBQ:Comparison of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium for RSI: Difference between revisions
(study design) |
(outcomes) |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
*138 (26%) received rocuronium | *138 (26%) received rocuronium | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 107: | Line 106: | ||
|} | |} | ||
*34 patients had recorded hyperkalemia (>5 mmol/L) before intubation | |||
**Rocuronium given to 23 of these patients | |||
Common sedative agents used: | Common sedative agents used: | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 18 September 2015
Under Review Journal Club Article
Laurin EG, et al. "A Comparison of Succinylcholine and Rocuronium for Rapid-sequence Intubation of Emergency Department Patients". Academic Emergency Medicine. 2000. 7(12):1362-9.
PubMed PDF
PubMed PDF
Clinical Question
How do succinylcholine and rocuronium compare for use is rapid-sequence intubation in the emergency department?
Conclusion
Both succinylcholine and rocuronium produce fast and reliable paralysis for RSI in the ED.
Major Points
| Outcome | Succinylcholine | Rocuronium | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Measured time of onset (± SD) | 39 ± 13 seconds | 44 ± 20 seconds | 0.04 |
| Frequency of body movements 0-10 (± SD) | 9.5 ± 1.1 | 9.1 ± 1.5 | 0.01 |
| Vocal cord movements 0-10 (± SD) | 9.2 ± 1.6 | 9.0 ± 1.6 | 0.15 |
| Satisfaction 0-10 (± SD) | 9.4 ± 1.3 | 8.8 ± 2.0 | <0.01 |
| Related complications | 1: QRS widening in pt with hyperkalemia | 0 | -- |
| Mean Dosage | 1.7 mg/kg | 1.0 mg/kg | -- |
- No patient desaturated and required assisted ventilations while waiting for paralysis to occur
Study Design
- Prospective cohort study at the UC Davis Medical Center, a level 1 trauma center
- Emergency physicians attended in-service about rocuronium before study, were given information on pharmacologic properties, indications for use, and dose for intubation (1.0 mg/kg used)
- Agreed indications for rocuronium use:
- Known or suspected hyperkalemia
- No medical history available
- Signs of increased intracranial pressure
- Chronic neuromuscular disease
- Crush injury
- Non-acute burns
- Globe injury
- To avoid a second dose of succinylcholine
- No paralytic agent was mandated, but succinylcholine continued to be first-choice agent.
- Data form completed by intubator immediately after intubation:
- Patient's name, age, gender
- Paralytic used
- Reason for use
- Time from administration to paralysis
- Serum K at time of intubation
- Need for BVM ventilation
- Pulse ox readings during intubation
- Complications
Population
Patient Demographics
- Mean age: 46 years old
- Range: days old-96 years old
- Male: 63%
Inclusion Criteria
- Every patient intubated in the ED from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 was eligible for enrollment
Exclusion Criteria
Interventions
Prospective observational study of paralytic use in ED
Outcomes
N= 521 patients who received RSI in the ED
- 382 (73%) received succinylcholine
- 138 (26%) received rocuronium
| Common Indications for Rocuronium Use | Number of Patients (%) |
|---|---|
| Suspected hyperkalemia | 53 (38%) |
| Chronic renal failure | 28 |
| Rhabdomyolysis | 6 |
| Lack of medical history | 43 (31%) |
| Known hyperkalemia | 11 (8%) |
| Neuromuscular disease | 11 (8%) |
- 34 patients had recorded hyperkalemia (>5 mmol/L) before intubation
- Rocuronium given to 23 of these patients
Common sedative agents used:
- Etomidate: 464 patients (89%), mean dose 0.29 mg/kg
- Midaolam: 12 patients(2%), mean dose 0.09 mg/kg
- Obtunded--no sedative used: 15 patients (3%)
- No sedation recorded: 14 patients (2%)
Criticisms & Further Discussion
- Onset of paralysis was only directly measured in 33% patients, with the rest being estimated by the person intubating
- Significant difference (p=0.04) was calculated only for the measured values, but no statistical significance was calculated for estimated values
- Although statistical significance of onset time was established, clinical significance is unclear as there were no incidences of desaturation in either group
- Physicians were allowed to hand-pick patients to include in the study without specific inclusion/exclusion criteria, introducing the possibility for selection bias.
- Patients were not randomized, and physicians were not blinded to medication choice.
- Satisfaction score, estimated time to paralysis may be biased
