Ingested foreign body: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
*CT chest
*CT chest
**Very high-yield for both radiopaque and nonradiopaque objects
**Very high-yield for both radiopaque and nonradiopaque objects
**CT with >99% sensitivity and 70-92% specificity for esophageal foreign body <ref>Loh WS, Eu DK, Loh SR, Chao SS. Efficacy of computed tomography scans in the evaluation of patients with esophageal foeign bodies. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol. Oct 2012; 121 (10) 678- 681</ref> <ref> Liu YC, Zhou SH, Ling L. Value of helial computed tomography in the early diagnosis of esophageal foreign bodies in adults. Am J Emerg Med. Sep 2013; 31 (9), 1328-32 </ref>
*Endoscopy
*Endoscopy



Revision as of 20:05, 1 September 2015

Background

  • Esophageal impaction can result in airway obstruction, stricture, or perforation
    • Perforation due to mechanical (ingested bones) or chemical corrosion (button battery)
  • Esophageal irritation (e.g. from swallowed bone) can be perceived as foreign body
  • Three common sites for obstruction
    • Upper 1/3 of esophagus at Cricopharyngeus muscle (most common)
    • Aortic Cross Over
    • Lower Esophageal Sphincter
  • Once object has traversed pylorus, usually passes without issue
    • Exceptions:
      • Irregular or sharp edges
      • Particularly wide (>2.5cm) or long (>6cm)

Clinical Features

Adults

  • Retrosternal pain
  • Dysphagia
  • Vomiting
  • Choking
  • Coughing/aspiration (if secretions pool proximal to the obstruction)

Children

Differential Diagnosis

  • Tracheal/lung aspiration

Diagnosis

Imaging

  • CXR PA and lateral
    • Coins in esophagus present their face on AP view
    • Coins in trachea present their face on lateral view
    • Bones can be visualized <50% of time
    • "Double-ring sign" = button battery (needs emergent removal)
  • CT chest
    • Very high-yield for both radiopaque and nonradiopaque objects
    • CT with >99% sensitivity and 70-92% specificity for esophageal foreign body [1] [2]
  • Endoscopy

Treatment

Urgent Endscopy

  • Complete obstruction of esophagus (pooling, risk of aspiration)
  • Ingestion of button batteries
  • Ingestion of sharp or elongated objects (toothpicks, soda can tabs)
  • Ingestion of multiple foreign bodies
  • Evidence of perforation
  • Coin at the level of the cricopharyngeus muscle in a child
  • Airway compromise
  • Presence of foreign body for >24hr

Food Impaction

  • Uncomplicated food impaction (no bones, incomplete obstruction) can be managed expectantly
    • Do not allow food bolus to remain impacted for >12-24hr
  • Consider Pharmacologic Therapies
    • Glucagon 1-2mg IV/IM (adults)
    • Nifedipine 5-10mg SL
    • Carbonated beverage
  • Obtain esophagogram after treatment to ensure passage

Coin Ingestion

  • Can attempt removal with a foley catheter under fluoroscopy, though not recommended as risk for aspiration or perforation
  • Should be admitted to ICU and removed by GI endoscopy within 24 hours

Button Battery

  • Call the National Button Battery Ingestion Hotline: 202-325-3333 (24/7)
  • True emergency if located in esophagus
    • Perforation can occur within 6hr of ingestion
    • Obtain urgent endoscopic removal
      • If endoscopy unavailable AND <2hr since ingestion Foley balloon technique can be tried
  • Batteries past the esophagus can be managed expectantly w/ 24hr f/u

Sharp Objects

  • Intestinal perforation from objects distal to stomach is common (up to 35%)
  • Require immediate removal (even if located in stomach or duodenum)
    • If object is distal to duodenum and pt is asymptomatic document passage w/ daily films
    • If object is distal to duodenum and pt symptomatic obtain immediate surgery consult

Narcotics Ingestion

  • Consider whole-bowel irrigation
  • Endoscopy contraindicated

Complications

  • Airway compromise
  • Aspiration pneumonia
  • Esophageal perforation/necrosis
  • Mediastinitis
  • Aortic perforation
  • Vocal cord paralysis

See Also

References

  • Roberts: Clinical Procedures in EM, 5th
  1. Loh WS, Eu DK, Loh SR, Chao SS. Efficacy of computed tomography scans in the evaluation of patients with esophageal foeign bodies. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol. Oct 2012; 121 (10) 678- 681
  2. Liu YC, Zhou SH, Ling L. Value of helial computed tomography in the early diagnosis of esophageal foreign bodies in adults. Am J Emerg Med. Sep 2013; 31 (9), 1328-32