Canadian cervical spine rule: Difference between revisions

m (Rossdonaldson1 moved page C-Spine (Canadian Rule) to Canadian cervical spine rule)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Canadian C-spine Rule  ==
==Background==
Only applies to GCS=15 and stable trauma. Not applicable for non-trauma, GCS<15, Hemodynamically unstable, Age <16, Acute paralysis, previous spinal disease or surgery.  
Only applies to GCS=15 and stable trauma. Not applicable for non-trauma, GCS<15, Hemodynamically unstable, Age <16, Acute paralysis, previous spinal disease or surgery.  


==Rule==
=== If ANY High Risk factor present – then get an X-ray  ===
=== If ANY High Risk factor present – then get an X-ray  ===
#Age >65 years  
#Age >65 years  

Revision as of 08:24, 27 January 2015

Background

Only applies to GCS=15 and stable trauma. Not applicable for non-trauma, GCS<15, Hemodynamically unstable, Age <16, Acute paralysis, previous spinal disease or surgery.

Rule

If ANY High Risk factor present – then get an X-ray

  1. Age >65 years
  2. Dangerous mechanism
    1. fall from elevation ≥ 3 feet / 5 stairs
    2. axial load to head, e.g. diving
    3. MVC high speed (>100km/hr), rollover, ejection
    4. motorized recreational vehicles
    5. bicycle struck or collision
  3. Parasthesia in extremities

If ANY Low-Risk factor present – then assess clinically with ROM testing

(If the answer to any of these is NO then get an x-ray)

  1. Simple rear-end MVC which DOES NOT include the following
    1. pushed into oncoming traffic
    2. hit by bus / large truck
    3. rollover
    4. hit by high speed vehicle
  2. Sitting in ED
  3. Ambulatory at anytime
  4. Delayed onset of neck pain
  5. Absence midline c-spine tenderness

Able to actively rotate neck?

  1. 45 Degree Left and Right? If able then NO x-ray needed. If unable, get an x-ray.

Canadian rule vs. Nexus

Sensitivity

Canadian 99.4% vs Nexus 90.7%

Specificity

Canadian 45.1% vs. Nexus 36.8%

Based on a prospective cohort trial Canadian rule "would have missed 1 patient and the [Nexus rule] would have missed 16 patients with important injuries."

See Also

Source

  1. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2510-2518
  2. http://www.ohri.ca/emerg/cdr/cspine.html