Talk:Pulmonary embolism: Difference between revisions
Ostermayer (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Cta doesn't seem to offer much of a fetal radiation benefit for pregnant women http://www.acr.org/~/media/186992e39e754270bb3abbf44a5a5801.pdf#page6 And there are just perfus...") |
m (Rossdonaldson1 moved page Talk:Pulmonary Embolism (PE) to Talk:Pulmonary embolism) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
VQ doesn't seem to offer much of a fetal radiation benefit for pregnant women http://www.acr.org/~/media/186992e39e754270bb3abbf44a5a5801.pdf#page6 | |||
And there are just perfusion scans as options http://www.resus.com.au/blog/vq-or-ctpa-in-suspected-pe-in-pregnancy/ | And there are just perfusion scans as options http://www.resus.com.au/blog/vq-or-ctpa-in-suspected-pe-in-pregnancy/ | ||
---- | |||
This is an important (and separate) topic. Lets move it to it's own page: [[PE in Pregnancy]] | |||
Latest revision as of 05:52, 27 October 2014
VQ doesn't seem to offer much of a fetal radiation benefit for pregnant women http://www.acr.org/~/media/186992e39e754270bb3abbf44a5a5801.pdf#page6
And there are just perfusion scans as options http://www.resus.com.au/blog/vq-or-ctpa-in-suspected-pe-in-pregnancy/
This is an important (and separate) topic. Lets move it to it's own page: PE in Pregnancy