EBQ:Japanese OHCA Prehospital Airway Management Trial: Difference between revisions
T.Boardman (talk | contribs) |
T.Boardman (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Clinical Question== | ==Clinical Question== | ||
*Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation? | *Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation? | ||
* | *Authors hypothesized that both supraglottic and endotracheal intubation would be associated with more favorable neurologic outcomes. | ||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 14 October 2019
incomplete Journal Club Article
Hasegawa, K et al. "Association of Prehospital Advanced Airway Management With Neurologic Outcome and Survival in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest". JAMA. 2012. 309 (3)(187612):257–266.
PubMed Full text PDF
PubMed Full text PDF
Clinical Question
- Do patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest have more favorable neurological outcome with advanced airway management by EMS compared to conventional bag-valve-mask ventilation?
- Authors hypothesized that both supraglottic and endotracheal intubation would be associated with more favorable neurologic outcomes.
Conclusion
- Advanced airway of any type was independently associated with decreased odds of neurologically favorable survival compared to BVM ventilation
Major Points
Inclusion Criteria
- January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010
- Japanese EMS database
- 18 years older who had out of hospital cardiac arrest
- Resuscitation was attempted by EMS and patient was transported to hospital
Exclusion Criteria
- no age recorded for cardiac arrest
- out of hospital airway records were not documented
Interventions
- advanced airway devices placed with either endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway
- providers had 2 attempts to place airway
- advanced airway confirmed with end-tidal CO2 and/or esophageal detection device
Outcome
Primary Outcomes
- favorable neurological outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest
- used Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance
- Category 1 (good performance)
- Category 2 (moderate disability)
- Category 3 (severe disability)
- Category 4 (vegetative state)
- Category 5 (death)
Secondary Outcomes
- Return of spontaneous circulation before hospital arrive
- 1 month survival
Subgroup analysis
- Advanced airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
- Endotracheal intubation or supraglottic airway versus bag-valve-mask ventilation
Criticisms
- Not a randomized and there is potential selection bias and confounding
