EBQ:Ottawa Ankle Rule Study: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
PMID 8433468
{{JC info
| title= Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.
| abbreviation= Ottawa Ankle Rule
| expansion= Ottawa Ankle Rule
| published= 1993
| author= Stiell I. et al.
| journal= JAMA
| year= 1993
| volume= 269
| issue= 9
| pages= 1127-32
| pmid= 8433468
| fulltexturl= http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=403941
| pdfurl=http://www.udel.edu/PT/PT%20Clinical%20Services/journalclub/caserounds/05_06/apr06/ottawa2.pdf
}}
==Clinical Question==


[[Category:EBQ]]
==Conclusion==
 
==Major Points==
 
==Study Design==
==Population==
===Patient Demographics===
===Inclusion Criteria===
 
===Exclusion Criteria===
 
==Interventions==
==Outcomes==
 
===Primary Outcome===
 
===Secondary Outcomes===
 
===Subgroup analysis===
 
==Criticisms & Further Discussion==
 
 
==Funding==
 
==Sources==
<references/>
 
[[Category:EBQ]][[Category:Ortho]]

Revision as of 22:24, 23 April 2014

incomplete Journal Club Article
Stiell I. et al.. "Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.". JAMA. 1993. 269(9):1127-32.
PubMed Full text PDF

Clinical Question

Conclusion

Major Points

Study Design

Population

Patient Demographics

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Interventions

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

Funding

Sources