Conducted energy device: Difference between revisions

Line 45: Line 45:
* No need for routine performance of labs, EKGs, or prolonged observation after CED exposure in otherwise awake and alert patient
* No need for routine performance of labs, EKGs, or prolonged observation after CED exposure in otherwise awake and alert patient
* More extensive testing and evaluation may be appropriate in individual cases based on history and physical examination i.e. EKG if chest pain, palpitations, or cardiac history
* More extensive testing and evaluation may be appropriate in individual cases based on history and physical examination i.e. EKG if chest pain, palpitations, or cardiac history


==Management==
==Management==

Revision as of 10:13, 27 February 2018

Background

  • Conducted Energy Device, Conducted Energy Weapon, Electronic Control Device, Electrical Control Device, and Electronic Control Weapon all refer to same thing
  • Purpose of a Conducted Energy Device (CED) is to provide law enforcement officers with broader choices on use of force spectrum
  • CEDs assist law enforcement officers with securing and controlling combative individuals
  • Use of Force by law enforcement should be least amount necessary to accomplish objective then escalate as needed by situation
  • Every other force option (impact weapons (baton), chemical weapon (pepper spray), etc.) also uses pain/discomfort for compliance and has associated risks of traumatic injury to suspect to facilitate capture, control, or restraint.
  • 99.75% of time no significant injury as result of using device per Department of Justice (DOJ) study [1]

Mechanism of Action

  • Either through direct contact or with fired probes which penetrate up to 1/2 inch into body a current is delivered which causes neuromuscular interference resulting in temporary paralysis for seconds which often results in uncontrolled fall.
    • Electrical current captures skeletal muscle and tends to stay on outside of muscle
    • Immediate relief occurs after application of energy ceases.
    • Pulse has less peak current than strong static shock.
    • Less than half current allowed in use of electric fence and less current than some pain blocking stimulators.

Advantages

  • CEDs reduce injuries to officers and suspects
  • CEDs effective in facilitating capture, control and restraint
  • CEDs are generally as safe or safer than other use of force options except deadly force
  • CEDs can prevent confrontations in escalating to use of deadly force

Disadvantages

  • CEDs are less accurate and reliable than a firearm
  • More than trivial force but less than deadly force when used
  • Uncontrolled fall associated with use of device can cause injury
  • Some individuals fail to react and continue to resist (thick clothing is known to sometimes block penetration of darts)
  • Probes may be dislodged when suspect is actively resisting, fleeing or engaging in excessive movement

Clinical Features

  • Consider underlying reason why CEDs was used i.e. medical crisis, serious physiological distress, drug/alcohol abuse, altered mental status, combative individual
  • No clinically relevant changes in ventilation, acid-base status, electrolyte concentrations, troponin I level or EKG noted [2]

Differential Diagnosis

Evaluation

  • Routine history and physical examination
    • Consider history of cardiac disease
    • Consider history of pacemaker/defibrillator
    • Consider drug or alcohol intoxication, psychiatric disturbance, altered mental status
  • Look for direct injury from barb and indirect injury from fall
  • No need for routine performance of labs, EKGs, or prolonged observation after CED exposure in otherwise awake and alert patient
  • More extensive testing and evaluation may be appropriate in individual cases based on history and physical examination i.e. EKG if chest pain, palpitations, or cardiac history

Management

  • Barb removal then wound care for small puncture wound and minor burn at barb site

Disposition

  • Most healthy individuals may be discharged (often to the custody of law enforcement) after barb removal
  • Appropriate medical intervention/consultation if barb in vulnerable area such as mouth, eyes, neck, groin

See Also

External Links

References

  1. Bozeman, W, et al. Safety and Injury Profile of Conducted Energy Weapons Used by Law Enforcement Officers Against Criminal Suspects, Annals of Emerg. Med. 2009.
  2. Vilke, GM, Sloane CM, Bouton KD, et al. Physiological Effects of a Conducted Electrical Weapon on Human Subjects. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2007; 50(5) 569-575.