Canadian cervical spine rule: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(clinically evaluable) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
#Delayed onset of neck pain | #Delayed onset of neck pain | ||
#Absence midline c-spine tenderness | #Absence midline c-spine tenderness | ||
#Clinically evaluable (no intoxication, not altered, etc.) | |||
=== Able to actively rotate neck? === | === Able to actively rotate neck? === | ||
Revision as of 22:34, 31 December 2013
Canadian C-spine Rule
Only applies to GCS=15 and stable trauma. Not applicable for non-trauma, GCS<15, Hemodynamically unstable, Age <16, Acute paralysis, previous spinal disease or surgery.
If ANY High Risk factor present – then get an X-ray
- Age >65 years
- Dangerous mechanism
- fall from elevation ≥ 3 feet / 5 stairs
- axial load to head, e.g. diving
- MVC high speed (>100km/hr), rollover, ejection
- motorized recreational vehicles
- bicycle struck or collision
- Parasthesia in extremities
If ANY Low-Risk factor present – then assess clinically with ROM testing
(If the answer to any of these is NO then get an x-ray)
- Simple rear-end MVC which DOES NOT include the following
- pushed into oncoming traffic
- hit by bus / large truck
- rollover
- hit by high speed vehicle
- Sitting in ED
- Ambulatory at anytime
- Delayed onset of neck pain
- Absence midline c-spine tenderness
- Clinically evaluable (no intoxication, not altered, etc.)
Able to actively rotate neck?
- 45 Degree Left and Right? If able then NO x-ray needed. If unable, get an x-ray.
Canadian rule vs. Nexus
Sensitivity
Canadian 99.4% vs Nexus 90.7%
Specificity
Canadian 45.1% vs. Nexus 36.8%
Based on a prospective cohort trial Canadian rule "would have missed 1 patient and the [Nexus rule] would have missed 16 patients with important injuries."
See Also
Source
- N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2510-2518
- http://www.ohri.ca/emerg/cdr/cspine.html
