Template:Journal Club Review: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
(Reverted edits by Panosiaa (talk) to last revision by Ostermayer)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{JC info
{{JC info
| title= Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of the caval index for noninvasive determination of low central venous pressure.
| title=  
| abbreviation=  
| abbreviation=  
| expansion=
| expansion=
| published=  
| published=  
| author=Nagdev AD1, Merchant RC, Tirado-Gonzalez A, Sisson CA, Murphy MC.
| author=  
| journal= Ann Emerg Med.
| journal=  
| year= 2010
| year=  
| volume= 3
| volume=  
| issue=55
| issue=
| pages= 290-295
| pages=  
| pmid= 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.04.021
| pmid=  
| fulltexturl= https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19556029
| fulltexturl=  
| pdfurl=http://www.annemergmed.com/article/S0196-0644(09)00482-X/pdf
| pdfurl=
}}
}}
==Clinical Question==
==Clinical Question==
Can emergency medicine physicians performing beside ultrasound measurement of the caval index predict a central venous pressure of less than 8 mmHg in emergency department patients?
 
 


==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==
 
Bedside ultrasound to measure the caval index can be a useful tool for emergency medicine physicians to predict patients with a central venous pressure of less than 8 mmHg.
 
 
 
Specifically collapsibility of greater than 50% with respiration can indicate intravascular volume status.
 
 


==Major Points==  
==Major Points==  


==Study Design==
==Study Design==
 
==Population==
==Population==
===Patient Demographics===
===Patient Demographics===
===Inclusion Criteria===
===Inclusion Criteria===


===Exclusion Criteria===
===Exclusion Criteria===


==Interventions==  
==Interventions==  
 
==Outcomes==
==Outcomes==
   
   


===Primary Outcome===
===Primary Outcome===


===Secondary Outcomes===  
===Secondary Outcomes===  
   
   


===Subgroup analysis===
===Subgroup analysis===
   
   


==Criticisms & Further Discussion==
==Criticisms & Further Discussion==
 
==External Links==
==External Links==



Latest revision as of 21:55, 5 July 2017

incomplete Journal Club Article
. "". '. . :.
PubMed

Clinical Question

Conclusion

Major Points

Study Design

Population

Patient Demographics

Inclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria

Interventions

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

Secondary Outcomes

Subgroup analysis

Criticisms & Further Discussion

External Links

See Also

Funding

References